You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
Hello,
I'm doing Jira automation scripts for Data Center instance. I have a script that is supposed to send a Slack message when JQL condition of "Resolution in (Duplicate)" in a match. However, I'm not getting the results what I'm hoping for. Details below:
Script for Slack message:
:two: <{{issue.url}}|{{issue.key}}> has been resolved by {{initiator.displayName}} as *DUPLICATE*.
It {{issue.issuelinks.type.inward}} <https://my.atlassian.net/browse/{{issue.issuelinks.outwardIssue.key}}|{{issue.issuelinks.outwardIssue.key}} {{issue.issuelinks.outwardIssue.fields.summary}}>.
What I'm expecting to see:
:two: PROJECT-123 has been resolved by Initiator as DUPLICATE.
It is duplicated by PROJECT-1234 This is the duplicate issue.
What I'm currently seeing:
:two: PROJECT-123 has been resolved by Initiator as DUPLICATE.
It .
Smart values:
issue.issuelinks.type.inward = "is duplicated by"
issue.issuelinks.outwardIssue.key = PROJECT-1234
issue.issuelinks.outwardIssue.fields.summary = "This is the duplicate issue"
---
So what am I doing wrong? Are the smart values in wrong format? Should they be #issue or #issuelinks instead?
Thank you!
// Jenni
The documentation for using issueLinks in Smart Values is severely lacking right now -- please provide feedback to Atlassian at the bottom of those documentation pages! Server/DC page here, Cloud page here.
Perhaps issue.issuelinks.outwardIssue might be a list? So perhaps Smart Value list traversal is needed? Server/DC docs here, Cloud docs here.
It might be coincidence that {{issue.issuelinks.outwardIssue.key}} appears to resolve as a scalar (not list) value when there is just one item in the list.
Yes, and...to what Mykenna notes:
I tried your complete expression with a Jira Cloud rule and it works as you expected. The only hiccup was when I had multiple linked issues outward...in which case it concatenated all of the results (i.e. no list iterator needed).
I recommend talking to your site admin to submit a ticket to support for this one to uncover the problem.
Kind regards,
Bill
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.