You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
I got a reopen automation rule where the issue is reopened after a new comment is made. It should exclude different forms thank. So I made a advanced compare condition that compares {{comment.body}} with a regex containing thank with the condition does not contain. If someone comments with thanks through Jira on the issue the rule is blocked. The problem is when someone reacts to a mail and that one is scraped and put in a comment. In the audit log the email reaction with thanks goes through and the automation is a succes. Do I need a different field when a email is made into a comment?
The problem was not being a email, but it was in the compare two values. I had it on does not match regular expression, but that only triggered in some cases. I needed a does not contain. I solved it by having it by making the condition "contains regular expression" and rewrite the regex with negative look ahead by adding "?!".
compare two values checks if:
{{comment.body}} contains regex ^(?i)(?![^,]*dank[^,]*|[^,]*thank[^,]*)
Now the rule fails if a comment contains a form thanks.
Hi @Functioneel Beheer Schadefonds
I am not following what you are asking as your need. Perhaps if you...
Thanks, and kind regards,
Bill
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.