At one time, there was an effort in the business community to use terms of "inclusivity". As a result, any term having to do with "master" was something that needed to change.
If you agree with this philosophy, is the term "scrum master" something that should be changed?
I reference this article:
U. Washington advises against ‘Scrum Master,’ ‘blacklist,’ in inclusive language style guide
"Instead of using “Scrum Master,” a term used in the agile project management framework, the university suggests alternatives including “Scrum Custodian” and “Scrum Guardian,” to avoid any association with slavery."
Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new comments.
![]() |
Camilo Galleguillos
|
Going to move this to a more appropriate group.
Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new comments.