The AI always says it can't answer that question, like it says it can't because it's “illegal,” when I'm clearly asking it for things that aren't illegal. A few months ago, you could ask it anything and it would answer you, but now every other minute it says the same thing and refuses.
Welcome to the community @ElEscarabajo Rovo hasn’t gotten “stricter,” but its safety filters have been updated. When a question is unclear or resembles a restricted topic, Rovo may incorrectly flag it as unsafe and refuse to answer, even if the request is harmless. This is a known behavior. Rephrasing the question with more context usually works, but if it keeps happening, share an example with Support—they can check whether the safety model is misclassifying your prompts.
Also shout out to @Dave Liao are you in town today??
@ElEscarabajo - is it a specific question, or all questions?
If it's a specific one, can you share what question you asked? Appreciate any insight!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I asked him to help me with a program I was debugging with IDA Pro, and he refused my request. For example, I asked him to help me understand the code in this part, and he refused to answer my question. I think it's because of the default server-side prompt in RoVoDev. That illegal and failed generate error always pops up.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
What are the URLs that appear in the code?
─── Response ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ────────────
I will search for all URLs present in the project's source code.
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
⬡ Calling grep:
• content_pattern: "https?://[^\\s\"')\\]>]+"
• path_glob: "*/src/main/java/**/*.java"
⬡ Calling grep:
───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ───────────────────────────
Rovo Dev is preparing tool calls... ctrl+c to interrupt
─────────────────────────────────────────── ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
─── Model Request Error ─────── ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Failed to generate an LLM response.
──────────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
──────────────────────────────── ────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
> █
That always happens when I talk about decompiled code.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
lol thanks @Dave Liao @ElEscarabajo Rovo likely refused the request because debugging decompiled code and reverse-engineering tools like IDA Pro trigger its safety filters. Even harmless questions can be flagged if they resemble prohibited reverse-engineering assistance. This is a server-side restriction, not a user setting. When the model blocks the request, Rovo Dev also fails to generate a response, which explains the repeated errors.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
But less than a month ago, the model responded normally regardless of whether it was on or off.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.