I am looking to transition to Confluence as a policy management platform. I want to know if anyone else is using it and how efficient it is. I also have metadata I want to track for each and everyone of these policies such as:
I want to know if this is feasible and if confluence is the right platform. I also want to use it for the upgraded security I feel like we can get from this.
Hi @Kasyah Sydnor, on top of what's already covered here (Page Properties, Databases, or Properties for the metadata schema), the aspect that's often forgotten is the content lifecycle itself.
Effective Date, Last Reviewed, Next Review: a field can hold each of those, but it won't chase down the owner, flag a policy that slipped past its review date, or hand you an audit-ready report.
That's what Better Content Archiving and Analytics for Confluence is built for:
Confluence's own Automation can approximate this, but it caps out at a few hundred pages per branch and ships with just 5 statuses, so it stops keeping up right around the point a policy library gets big enough to matter. nCino (1,400+ users) hit exactly that wall before switching over, and cut their page count 30% in the process.
Docs are here if you want the full picture. I'm one of the people building this at Midori, so feel free to drop me a line directly at levente.szabo@midori-global.com if you want to talk through your content lifecycle strategy.
Yes, you can. How exactly, depends on a lot of variables and details of your requirements.
For example...
How does your typical policy document look like? Is it a single page? Is it a collection of pages?
Confluence gives you plenty of options to see and monitor details that you listed. For example, Confluence Databases. Most of the details are right there in the configuration, some (keywords) can be added manually. You can check our Best Practices for Confluence Databases.
You can also use macros like page properties and Cards. Especially Cards to monitor how long since the page was last updated (more on this here: Use Confluence Content Manager and Create Your Personal Command Center).
I would advise to set up a bunch of pages and experiment with Databases and tools described in the second article.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hey @Kasyah Sydnor ,
I can agree with Kris and maybe suggest databases for this (together with actual pages for policy content).
It would probably be best bet if you want to do it 'natively' without any addons.
As for actual data protection (if you're looking for that), Atlassian covers things like:
Data Protection: All data is encrypted at rest using AES-256 and in transit via TLS 1.2+.
Access Control: You can use Space permissions for broad access and Page restrictions to lock down specific sensitive policies to certain users or groups.
Auditability: The Audit Log tracks changes to settings and permissions, while Page History provides a full audit trail of every version and edit made to a policy.
Atlassian Guard: For advanced needs, Atlassian Guard adds Single Sign-On (SSO), Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), and automated user provisioning.
Everything related to trust and security can be found here: Atlassian Trust Center
I don't have an example of using Confluence as a Policy Management Platform, but it should be doable. 🤔
Cheers,
Tobi
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Kasyah Sydnor,
One additional approach you may want to consider is keeping each policy as a regular Confluence page and using the native Page Properties macro for the metadata you listed.
For example, every policy page could contain:
You can then aggregate those pages into a central policy register.
We are currently working on Page Properties support in Simple Tables, which we are aiming to release in September.
The idea is to use the existing Page Properties as a data source and turn them into an interactive table where users can search, sort and filter the policy register, without changing how the individual policy pages are authored.
Policy pages → Page Properties → searchable and filterable policy register
I think the main difference compared with Confluence Databases is where you want the source of truth to live.
If the database entry is the primary record, Confluence Databases are a very natural fit.
If the Confluence page itself is the policy/document and you want the metadata to stay with that document, Page Properties + reporting can be a very simple model.
We are actually looking at policy management as one of the use cases while finishing this integration, so the fields you listed are very helpful.
Hope this gives you another option to consider 🙂
— Mia Tamm
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Kasyah Sydnor, Confluence can absolutely work as a policy management platform, and many teams use it this way. Out of the box, you can create a page per policy and use the native Content Properties macro to add metadata like the owner, status, or effective date. The limitation is that native Content Properties is a free-text key-value table: there are no typed fields (no date pickers, no user pickers, no dropdowns), no reusable schemas you define once and apply consistently, and the report macro that aggregates those fields across pages is read-only - you can't update a value from the report view, you have to open each page individually.
For the metadata list you described: document ID, category, status, owner, keywords, etc., I think it would make more sense for you to have fields with enforced input widgets, not free-text. That's where a Marketplace app helps. If you're open to using an app, I'd recommend Properties. Full disclosure: I am affiliated with the team behind the app.
With Properties, you define a Property Group (essentially a reusable schema) with each of your fields configured as the right type: date fields for Effective Date / Last Reviewed / Next Review, a user picker for Owner and Approved By, a status field or dropdown for Current Version and Status, text for Document ID and Keywords, and so on. There's also a version log showing who changed which field and when, which is useful for any compliance or audit requirements.
It is up to you to decide whether you want to display this table on the page or hide the properties behind the byline button.
There is also a Property Report that aggregates all your policies into a single filterable, sortable table with inline editing so you can update values directly from the report without opening each policy page.
For the approval and review cycle side of things, and enforcing that a policy goes through a formal review before it's published, tracking who approved it, and automatically triggering a re-review after a set period, there is a separate gap that native Confluence also doesn't cover. That's where Aura Workflow & Approval comes in, and it integrates well with the metadata approach above.
But if your first question is just whether tracking structured metadata per policy is feasible in Confluence, the answer is yes, and Properties handles that part directly.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.