The Atlassian Community Forums are currently in read-only mode. We will be relaunching on a new platform on September 22 (read more here). We apologize for the extended downtime. For concerns or questions, please email communitymanagers@atlassian.com. See you on the other side, on the new Atlassian Community Forums! :)
× Create
Turn on suggestions
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for
Community resources
Community resources
Community resources
Using Bitbucket with SQL Server without db_owner role
Ben Jones
June 11, 2019 edited
We need to migrate our SQL Server database into a more restrictive environment where the user will not be in the db_owner role.
Bitbucket documentation suggests db_owner is necessary, but best practice in a corporate environment is usually not to give users db_owner rights. I'm sure we're not the first people to face this.
Does anyone else have experience doing it?
What privileges are required for bitbucket to successfully run without being db_owner?
0 answers
Comments for this post are closed
Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.
Copyright © 2026 Atlassian