I am experiencing an issue in our Bitbucket Cloud repository. Occasionally, when creating a Pull Request, I cannot see other users' branches in the branch dropdown, even though the branches exist.
At the same time, Bitbucket displays the message: "The repository is currently being indexed. Please try again later."
Could this indexing issue be causing the missing branches? Is there a way to refresh or resolve the repository indexing?
Hi @Rachna Bhavsar, yes, those two go together. Atlassian's KB for commits and branches not rendering lists internal database and indexing problems as one of the causes, and the remedy there isn't self-serve. Bitbucket Cloud Support run garbage collection on the repo, which rebuilds the internal databases and indexes. No reindex button on your side.
Check the repo's branch and tag count before you raise it. That same page puts the guidance at under 1,500 branches and tags combined, and says Bitbucket Cloud can't guarantee reliable performance above that.
Branch count has not yet reached 1500
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Then it isn't the size guidance. That leaves the index cause on that page, which fits your banner anyway.
Timing is what will make or break the ticket. It only happens occasionally for you, so note the exact times you see the message and raise it while it's happening if you can. Otherwise they'll be looking at a repo that's behaving fine.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The next time it occurs - can you check the network tab in your browser console and look for a traceID/SentryError on the HTTP request and share that code with us?
If you're unable to - please let me know as I'll need to raise a ticket. Please let me know your timezone so I may raise it with the appropriate team.
Cheers!
- Ben (Bitbucket Cloud Support)
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
TraceId:fe5e85ad04d34a87a56ae6ba67f99806
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Another issue has been observed with Bitbucket.
There are two separate workspaces. Let's say Workspace 1 is mine and Workspace 2 belongs to another developer. I have access to some branches in the other workspace as well.
However, when I try to create a pull request within my own workspace and my own repository for a specific branch, I notice an issue with the reviewer list. Bitbucket is displaying a user who is not a member of my repository (they belong to the other workspace/repository), while another user who is currently a member of my repository is not available for selection as a reviewer.
Could you help explain why Bitbucket is showing a user from a different workspace/repository as a reviewer while not listing the current user who should have access to this repository?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Our setup:
Issue:
git fetch), and the remote branches are visible locally.We have also intermittently seen the following message: "The repository is currently being indexed. Please try again later."
Additionally, we have noticed that a user who left our organization several years ago still appears in the Pull Request interface, which makes us suspect there may be a repository metadata or indexing issue.
Questions:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The reviewer list is a separate bug. Reviewer search only stays scoped to your workspace when the repository is private, on a public repo it searches every Bitbucket account, which is how someone from User2's workspace, and maybe your old colleague, surfaces as a suggestion. Check Repository settings, Repository details, Access level, and confirm this repository is private is ticked.
For the member who's missing, workspace membership alone doesn't earn a reviewer slot. They need Read on this specific repository, granted separately under the repo's own Settings, Repository permissions.
On the indexing questions: the KB you and Ben are already using names indexing problems as one of three causes, there's no self-serve rebuild on Cloud, and GC is Support-only. With your trace IDs posted, that's in his hands now.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for the clarification — that explains the reviewer list, makes sense.
I'll check the repository's Access level under Repository settings and confirm it's set to private, and will also review Repository permissions to grant explicit Read access to the missing member. Will follow up if either of those doesn't resolve as expected.
For the indexing issue itself, understood that it's with your engineer now given the trace IDs already posted — please let us know once GC/reindexing has been run, or if you need anything further from our side in the meantime. This is still blocking us from raising PRs against [User2's repo], so any update on timeline would help.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.