The Atlassian Community Forums are currently in read-only mode. We will be relaunching on a new platform on September 22 (read more here). We apologize for the extended downtime. For concerns or questions, please email communitymanagers@atlassian.com. See you on the other side, on the new Atlassian Community Forums! :)

×

Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Too many IPs required for BitBucket webhooks

tm56
I'm New Here
I'm New Here
Those new to the Atlassian Community have posted less than three times. Give them a warm welcome!
July 24, 2024

We're moving an app to a shared, secured server, protected by a firewall.

We need to allow BitBucket's webhook incoming push requests through this firewall, which offers only 20 IP rules.

BitBucket's webhook requests come from no less than 34 different IP addresses!

Even if we combine them with CIDR, this would still use up a lot of slots, and wouldn't leave enough rules available for the other required allowed IPs.

Is there no better way to allow these webhook incoming requests, using up less IP slots?

If not, this would mean we need to set up a pipeline for this specific app. This is quite a chore, we'd be happy to skip.

 

Thanks

1 answer

Comments for this post are closed

Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.

0 votes
Ben
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
July 24, 2024

Hi @tm56 

With constant uptime/reliability in mind - it is recommended to whitelist all of these IP addresses, as we use multiple distributed servers to deliver content/connectivity to our platforms.

I would suggest either considering an upgrade of your firewall, or preparing a Pipeline to handle this connectivity. 

Cheers!

- Ben (Bitbucket Cloud Support)

DEPLOYMENT TYPE
CLOUD
PRODUCT PLAN
STANDARD
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events