The Atlassian Community Forums are currently in read-only mode. We will be relaunching on a new platform on September 22 (read more here). We apologize for the extended downtime. For concerns or questions, please email communitymanagers@atlassian.com. See you on the other side, on the new Atlassian Community Forums! :)

×

Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results forĀ 
Search instead forĀ 
Did you mean:Ā 

Crucible - Add Content to Review - Nested branches

Eric Martin
I'm New Here
I'm New Here
Those new to the Atlassian Community have posted less than three times. Give them a warm welcome!
October 1, 2012

Hello,

We are finally starting to use Crucible and have run into a question/issue. When adding content to a review (Add Content > Browse Changesets), it appears that we are unable to navigate to or choose a nested branch. For example, we have the following branch structure:

/branches
/team1
/project1
/project2
/team2
/project3
/project4

So, I was wondering if I was doing something wrong, or if it is not supported. If it is the latter, I am curious as to why (best practice, technical constraint, etc.).

We've tossed around the idea of making our branch structure flat (one level), but wanted to investigate further before changing our entire process.

Thanks!

1 answer

1 accepted

Comments for this post are closed

Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.

0 votes
Answer accepted
lpater
Atlassian Team
Atlassian Team members are employees working across the company in a wide variety of roles.
November 4, 2012

Hi Eric,

While the list of branches in Browse Changesets is indeed flat, you can probably configure Crucible svn handling to use your current repository structure and get branches that are mapped to your directories with names like 'team1-project1' and 'team2-project3'.

To do that you'll have to set up symbolic rules for the svn repository, to tell Crucible what you consider a branch. You can see the details on this feature here: https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/FISHEYE/SVN+tag+and+branch+structure. I believe your repo structure is similar to the 'Example from FishEye customer' one and you could use similar rules.

TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events