Hi Community!
Charlie here from the Atlassian Automation product team. We're working on making it easier to test & troubleshoot your automation flows, and we'd love to hear your feedback.
If you have any thoughts or suggestions for how we can make this easier for you, leave a comment below, or book time for a chat with the Automation team here: https://calendly.com/cgavey/automation-feedback?month=2025-12
Thanks,
Charlie
Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.
A few thoughts:
My upvote especially for
Filtering options for the Automation -> Recent rule runs section on the issue view. I think it would be useful to be able to filter out automations that triggered on a particular issue but didn't actually do anything (think signal to noise ratio)
Right now we just see the last 8 runs from which most runs did not pass the trigger condition. I pretty much like the idea to see automation runs directly on the issue, but the current implementation is pretty much useless and I end up in the audit log search again.
Also any updates on the entire topic?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I would like to see a smart value debug action to show all the smart values and their JSON structure/hierarchy. There are smart values which do not show up in the smart values like {{rule.name}}, for example.
The "magic" that happens behind the scenes actually makes automations more difficult to create and debug. For example, a log action to show {{issue.Location}} (a single choice select list field) works but when stringing it together with a function like substringBefore, the value is needed as in {{issue.Location.value.substringBefore(" ")}}.
Having the ability to add comments would be very helpful as well. We use a lot of ingenuity to work around the many limitations of automations and would love to be able to add inline documentation to the automation rather than squeezing it all into the description.
Thank you, Charlie, for starting this topic and soliciting feedback!
Bret
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Suggestions:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Having a way to search automations for information -> i.e. What automations reference a specific customfield. I had to change a few customfields and remove a few and finding the reference is super painful.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
This topic is now closed as the discussion has become outdated. If you have more questions or want to continue the conversation, feel free to start a new topic. For more details on why we close older threads, check out our Rules of engagement - Atlassian Community .
Thank you for your understanding!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Using the automation button today for manually triggered automations is convenient, but if you have very many manual triggers that list gets unwieldy very quickly. Being able to have automations grouped/filtered beyond "From workflow" and "From automations" would make it so much easier to see/find specific automations as the list grows for both troubleshooting and from a UX perspective. For example, showing other metadata (description, actions used, etc.) or having some ability to group your manually triggered actions would make it easier to find new rules you're testing.
I know our team has also struggled with a good way to temporarily ignore/comment out logic. Often we would insert some logic, need to remove it, and then add it back again. Being able to change an automation Component to "Ignored" to have it skipped would be so useful.
Similarly useful would be the ability to provide comments on Components to better understand the logic/rationale, including Components that are ignored/skipped.
If automations were code, you could do a simple Find command to search for specific words. In automations, you have to expand specific components to see all of the details. For large/complex automations (especially branching rules), you have to click through most of the Components to find what you're looking for. To have an "Expand all" or a "Code view" option that would make searching/finding specific words/text would save a lot of maintenance and troubleshooting time.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Here are a couple of things that I know others have talked about:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hello @Charlie Gavey ,
A good initiative to know about Automation feedback.
Seems, calendly schedule is about in AM timeline, will drop notes here.
- Major:
A view for automation run is shown for top few automation, but that this was part of many other runs, that's no where easy to find.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Charlie, some requests below:
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
- Ticket about the failure is a good use case.
- If automation can have an event endpoint- would be good.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Community moderators have prevented the ability to post new answers.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.