Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

SLA and WIP Limits đźš© OR how to avoid Red Flags in team performance?

Imagine this scenario: one team member is buried under a pile of tasks while the rest work steadily. Deadlines are looming, work quality is declining, and stress levels are rising. Sounds familiar?

Uncontrolled task accumulation can lead to chaos, burnout, and, worst of all, SLA breaches. This is where WIP limits come to the rescue. They help prevent overload, balance workloads, and improve team efficiency.

But are WIP limits alone enough? Or can SLAs on their save the day? Let’s explore how combining both helps maintain stable productivity without stress or missed deadlines.

A quick overview of WIP limits

WIP limits (Work In Progress limits) are intentional restrictions on the number of tasks in progress at any given time. They are an essential tool for improving focus, efficiency, and the overall effectiveness of your workflow.

WIP limits are most commonly used in Kanban workflows to prevent work overload. In Kanban, WIP limits can be applied to specific columns (e.g., "In Progress") or the total number of tasks assigned to an individual. It is best to set WIP limits after monitoring the average number of work items in each status over several sprints.

 

For example, the “In Progress” column can have a WIP limit of 3 tasks for medium-priority items or a stricter limit of 2 tasks for high-priority items. This ensures that employees maintain focus and productivity. By preventing overload, this approach helps team members avoid missed deadlines or a decline in task quality.


How WIP limits and SLA can work together?

Regarding optimizing workflows, teams can operate under three scenarios depending on whether they use WIP limits, SLAs, or a combination of both. Let’s break down these scenarios and see how they impact efficiency and performance.

Key 1: Using WIP limits only

This scenario focuses on controlling the number of tasks in progress to prevent team overload. While this approach helps improve focus and reduce bottlenecks, it doesn’t ensure tasks are completed within specific timeframes.

🚨🚩 Red Flag Alert: Critical deadlines may be missed without SLA tracking, leading to delays and client dissatisfaction. Balancing WIP limits with SLA helps ensure timely delivery.

Key 2: Using SLA only

Teams that rely solely on SLA focus on meeting deadlines for each task or service. While this ensures timely delivery, it doesn’t address the risks of team overload or workflow inefficiencies.

🚨🚩Red Flag Alert: Teams working solely with SLA might face burnout or quality issues as they rush to meet deadlines without managing task volumes.

Key 3: Combining WIP Limits and SLA - the best way âś…

This is the ideal scenario where teams use WIP limits to manage workloads while SLAs ensure timely task completion. This balanced approach helps optimize performance, reduce burnout, and meet client expectations. So, let's continue with this scenario.


So, integrating WIP limits into your SLA strategy ensures your team isn’t just meeting deadlines but doing so sustainably and productively.

Best Practices:

🎯 Set realistic WIP limits based on team capacity.

🎯 Use SLA tracking to refine workflows.

🎯 Leverage reports to align WIP limits with SLA goals.


How WIP limits enhance SLA compliance across different teams

Combining WIP limits with SLA is crucial to achieving actual workflow efficiency and meeting SLA (Service Level Agreement) goals. WIP limits help maintain focus, reduce task switching, and ensure teams prioritize the most critical work, leading to better SLA adherence. Here are examples of how different types of teams can benefit from using both SLA and WIP limits, managed effortlessly through SLA Time and Report for Jira.

#1. Support teams

🤝Support teams often deal with an overwhelming number of tickets, many of which vary in priority. Without WIP limits, attention may scatter, and critical tickets can be delayed or even overlooked, resulting in missed SLAs.

Solution with WIP Limits:

Set WIP limits for critical tasks to ensure only a manageable number of high-priority tickets are being worked on simultaneously. For example, a WIP limit of 2 critical or 5 medium tickets per assignee allows the team to focus on the most urgent issues without distractions from less critical ones.

In the screenshot, you can see how implementing WIP limits enhanced the support team’s workflow. As a result, it improved SLA performance by ensuring a balanced workload distribution among team members.

#2. Development teams

👨‍💻For developers, juggling multiple bug fixes can create chaos. For instance, a developer might start working on one bug only to switch to another due to its higher priority, leaving the first bug unresolved and potentially breaching SLAs.

Solution with WIP Limits:

Implement WIP limits to restrict the number of bugs a developer can address simultaneously. For example, a limit of 1-2 critical or 4 high bugs ensures focus on resolving the most impactful issue before moving to the next.

The "To Review" column on a Kanban board represents stories that have been completed but still need to be reviewed before merging into the codebase. Timely code reviews are critical for maintaining quality, accelerating innovation, and streamlining development processes. 

🎯How WIP Limits Help:

Setting WIP limits on the "To Review" column ensures that unreviewed code doesn’t pile up. For instance, a limit of 2 reviews per developer ensures tasks are acted on urgently, maintaining steady progress in the development pipeline and avoiding bottlenecks.

# 3.Sysadmins

⚙️Sysadmins often handle urgent and critical tasks like server maintenance, security patches, or downtime incidents. Lower-priority tasks can pile up without WIP limits alongside critical issues, leading to SLA violations for business-critical tasks.

Solution with WIP Limits:

Set WIP limits on tasks related to critical systems or incidents. For instance, a limit of 3 high-priority tasks ensures sysadmins can handle urgent incidents without losing track of more minor but necessary requests.

In this example, you can also see how implementing WIP limits has significantly improved SLA compliance. By limiting the number of tasks in progress, the team could focus on high-priority work, reduce delays, and ensure that critical deadlines were consistently met. This enhanced workflow efficiency and contributed to higher team satisfaction and better overall performance.


Combine WIP limits with SLA management

Integrating WIP limits with SLA management can dramatically change your team’s productivity and efficiency. And with the help of additional plugins like SLA Time and Report for Jira, you can help teams streamline workflows, avoid alerts, and effortlessly achieve SLA compliance. 

One of the key advantages of SLA Time and Report for Jira is its detailed and customizable reporting capabilities. The reports allow you to:

  • Track SLA compliance by assignee, ensuring individual workloads are manageable and balanced.

  • Monitor tasks at every stage of the workflow, helping to identify bottlenecks and areas that need improvement.

You can use “SLA Met vs Exceeded per Criteria” to evaluate SLA performance based on key factors like Assignee, Priority, Organization, Complexity, and more. This helps teams identify workload distribution patterns, optimize WIP limits, and ensure SLA compliance across different criteria. Here's what it looks like:

 

Also, SLA Time and Report allows you to set timers and conditions based on your needs. đź’ˇFor example, assign different SLA rules to tasks based on priority (e.g., 4 hours for critical tasks, 2 days for low-priority ones).

Combine SLA timers with WIP limits to ensure timely task completion without overwhelming the team. Custom SLAs paired with WIP limits ensure the team focuses on high-priority tasks while maintaining efficiency.

With real-time SLA tracking and visual indicators, teams can easily track progress and identify risky tasks.

On the SLA timer, you can also monitor how much time is left until the SLA goal is exceeded. Tickets with exceeded timers are red. Before the issue meets the time goals or after it is met, a goal - is green.

 

Whether you’re managing a support team, a development team, or internal operations, the plugin adapts to your specific workflow. Every team can customize the plugin to fit their unique workflow, making it a versatile solution for any organization.


The bottom line

Effective workload management is not just about meeting deadlines or limiting the number of tasks. It’s about balancing productivity, work quality, and team sustainability.

The combination of WIP limits and SLAs helps achieve this balance. WIP limits prevent chaos and keep the team focused on priority tasks, while SLAs ensure those tasks are completed on time. Together, they create a powerful system for controlling and optimizing workflows.

To successfully implement this approach, teams should:
âś… Set realistic WIP limits based on team capacity.
âś… Configure SLAs that align with business goals.
âś… Use tracking and reporting tools to monitor, analyze, and improve processes.

No matter what workflow system you use—Kanban, Scrum, or a hybrid model—integrating WIP limits with SLA tracking will help reduce overload, maintain work quality, and ensure long-term productivity.

To simplify and improve SLA tracking, try SLA Time and Report—a tool designed to streamline workflows and enhance SLA compliance effortlessly.

2 comments

Bill Sheboy
Rising Star
Rising Star
Rising Stars are recognized for providing high-quality answers to other users. Rising Stars receive a certificate of achievement and are on the path to becoming Community Leaders.
March 10, 2025

Greetings, community!

In my experience, some causes of "WIP churn" / "WIP debt" for a team's workflow are:

  • confusing Priority and Classes of Service while using...
  • Work In Process (WIP) limits without considering team capacity, Service Level Expectations (SLE) and Service Level Agreements (SLA); where the key words are "capacity", "expectations", and "agreements"; and
  • failing to actively monitor and adjust the above definitions when something changes for the people, product, and processes

Prioritizing incorrectly or misusing Classes of Service will lead to ever increasing levels of WIP, particularly when intake does not identify requestors trying to jump the line to side-track the agreements, resulting in delivery team people switching context of in-progress work.  Similar challenges happen when product quality decreases and is not managed appropriately by all participants. 

Measures help to manage flow better when the people requesting services and those delivering them actively collaborate with candor and trust.

Kind regards,
Bill

Like • Alina Kurinna _SaaSJet_ likes this
Alina Kurinna _SaaSJet_
Atlassian Partner
March 10, 2025

Hello! @Bill Sheboy !

Thank you for sharing your experience in the comment!

Do you have any favorite methods or tools for tracking and analyzing WIP limits and SLAs? We’d love to hear more about your experience!

Comment

Log in or Sign up to comment
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events