I love psychology for its paradoxes - especially the ones that show up not in therapy rooms, but inside teams and leadership discussions.
One of the most common scenarios I see looks like this:
A person or a team comes with a complaint:
“We’re stuck. There’s no real progress.”
The response is almost always the same:
Let’s clarify your identity - who are you as a leader or a team?
Let’s define the big vision - where do you see yourselves in 3–5 years?
Let’s build a detailed long-term plan.
Vision boards, archetypes, strategic pyramids - all designed to lock down a clear answer to one question:
Who are we?
And here lies the core mistake.
Most of these approaches assume that people and teams are rational decision-makers.
But behavioral science has shown the opposite — we are deeply irrational.
Daniel Kahneman earned a Nobel Prize proving exactly this.
Identity can be a foundation.
But it can also become a trap.
We hold onto past decisions and chosen roles because of cognitive biases:
Consistency bias - continuing what we already started, even if it no longer works.
Sunk cost fallacy - refusing to abandon investments that lead to losses.
Confirmation bias - noticing only the data that supports our current direction.
Availability heuristic - choosing easy or familiar options instead of effective ones.
Survivorship bias - copying rare success stories while ignoring the many failures behind them.
Kahneman once noted that investors lose money not because they choose bad strategies, but because they refuse to let go of them.
In Agile terms, this is even more blunt:
The ability to rethink is a competitive advantage.
When teams try to lock in answers like:
“Who are we?”
“What will we be in five years?”
they unintentionally block adaptability.
Psychology and biology tell us the same thing:
In phases of exploration, fixation is harmful.
Strong identity activates the consistency bias:
We protect our strategy because it’s part of who we are - not because it actually works.
Instead of Agile’s natural rhythm:
Hypothesis -- Experiment -- Review -- Adapt
teams fall into:
Identity -- Long-term Plan -- Defense -- Stagnation
The identity becomes more important than reality.
Agile is not about finding the “correct identity.”
It’s about continuously testing behavior through action:
Hypothesis -- Small experiments -- Fast feedback -- Adjustment
Just like products evolve through experimentation, teams and leaders should evolve through behavioral prototypes - not static self-definitions.
Their core problem isn’t identity.
The real question isn’t:
“Who are we?”
But rather:
“What actions can we commit to regularly?”
They don’t need five-year roadmaps.
They need short cycles, execution discipline, and repeatable processes.
Identity emerges as a byproduct of action, not as a planning exercise.
Here lies the second danger.
The more tightly a team binds itself to its identity:
“We’re an enterprise company.”
“We’re innovation leaders.”
“We’ve always done it this way.”
the harder it becomes to change direction.
At this stage, cognitive biases become lethal:
Status quo bias
Consistency bias
Confirmation blindness
Companies don’t collapse because they lack strategies.
They fail because no one can let go of yesterday’s definition of who we are.
Paul Graham captured this perfectly in his essay
“Keep Your Identity Small.”
The more strongly you tie your beliefs to your identity,
the harder it becomes to change your mind.
True Agile mindset depends on three skills:
Creating hypotheses instead of doctrines.
Acting in short validation cycles.
Letting go of outdated self-images quickly.
Agile values adaptation over sticking to plans.
And that means:
Small identity beats big strategy.
Agile doesn’t require teams to know exactly who they are.
Agile requires teams to be:
Curious enough to test new paths.
Brave enough to drop old ones.
Humble enough to say: “This no longer fits us - let’s change.”
Because the real competitive advantage isn’t a perfectly designed identity.
It’s the ability to redesign it - again and again - through action.
Vlad from Teamline
0 comments