Working on multiple independent git-flow feature branches

What is the procedure for working on multiple independent git-flow initiated features? Let's say I have started one feature but stop working on that feature. I now want to start work on a new feature based on the "develop" branch but does not use anything from the feature I already started. I also want to keep the other feature's code for committing later.

Edit: I see this is a duplicate of this question but I am not clear about the two options in the answer given. I am keeping my feature branches local. If I commit the changes to a local branch "feature A" then start a new git-flow local branch "feature B" will feature B contain the changes for feature A (both are branched from the "develop" branch). Or is the better option to "stash" changes for feature A and start the new feature B branch?

2 answers

1 accepted

0 votes
Accepted answer

You can commit your WIP changes to the feature branch, then start another feature. Features always begin from the develop branch anyway, but you can checkout the develop branch explicitly first if that makes you feel more comfortable. All feature branches are independent, they will only share code if one of them was finished (therefore merged back into develop) before the other was started.

It might be worth clarifying that it's fine and indeed very common to have multiple feature branches in progress at once. You can't, however, have more than one release or hotfix branch in progress at once. This makes sense because you really only want to use these while you're preparing the next release / hotfix, there's no reason to have many of them in parallel.

Thanks. That clarified it for me.

Here question is how do you test multiple features?

Do you have like setup so that QA can test all features simultaniously?


"there's no reason to have many of them in parallel"

Maybe not many, but I think we have a pretty good reason for having several of them in parallel: we work towards several planned releases in parallel. More specifically, we test towards several releases in parallel: while one release is in user acceptance test, the next is in system test, etc. We don't want to accept any new features for a given release while we test (and certainly not for a future, perhaps unrelated release), so wouldn't it seem reasonable to branch off for each release before we start testing? That being the case, we will usually have several active at the same time. Maybe it depends on whether you're working on a self-contained software product or, as we are, on elements of a business system that includes people and processes.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
Community showcase
Published Oct 23, 2018 in Sourcetree

Tip from the team: configure your repos for hosting goodness!

Supported Platforms macOS Windows We recently introduced support for additional hosting services such as GitHub Enterprise, GitLab (Cloud, Community Edition, Enterprise Edition), and...

1,110 views 4 2
Read article

Atlassian User Groups

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find a group

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find my local user group

Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.

Start an AUG

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local meet up. Learn more about AUGs

Groups near you