Visualizing history in Source Tree

[Oscar Alvarez (Alvargon)]

hi there, I have some problems with source tree, before I can create a branch an see it in the graph, but now all the branches are in the same place, master. What could be the problem? Maybe am I doing something wrong?

Look the img, 90% o fthe comits are branches:

[retepv_1st]

Weird. After I merged the "fix-not-all..." branch back into "master", I suddenly see the branch appear in the graph.

Before I post a million more posts, I'll hang on until someone replies. ;)

[retepv_1st]

Today, I noticed the same thing happening to me. Check out the screen shot. There are 2 branches (and a master branch), and I have made commits and pushed in all of them. And one (the "change_b..." branch) was merged back into master.

But I don't see any of that in my branch graph, there is just one line. Please check the screen shot.

I have also made a screenshot of git log --graph. When making these screenshots, my working branch was "fix-not-all...".

I'm using git version 2.49.0 on a MacBook.

I guess Sourcetree uses the output of 'git log --graph', so this seems to be a problem of git. Or maybe they changed some options.

[minnsey]

Hi

Have you made any commits to those branches? If not they will just appear as markers against the commit they were branched from. 

[Oscar Alvarez (Alvargon)]

I have 3 even 5 commits in some branches .

[minnsey]

if you run 

>git log --graph

what do you see?

[Oscar Alvarez (Alvargon)]

Hi, similar to the first imagen, only one line of commits and branches. 

[minnsey]

OK, so Sourcetree is correctly reflecting the git view of the repository?

Do you get any difference if you change the graph between data and ancestor order?