Hi, I've been reading several questions but I can't get things clear. Let's say I have the following file structure:
and then I rename 'test' folder to 'test1', then the current state is:
What I found in source tree is that two sections appear: one with staged files, where the change has been detected as a rename and the other one with unstaged files.
After doing some tests, I've reached the conclusion that the only way to keep the history of the 'file1.kt' is to commit first the unstaged files, where the rename is detected and then commit the rest. Otherwise if I do it in just one commit, the change is detected as a delete and an addition, losing the history as a consequence. Can someone explain to me why it works like this and how should be done properly? In this thread they comment that renaming and editing shouldn't be done in the same commit, I don't know if it has some relation.
Thanks in advance.
Hello Sourcetree users!!! With the recent removal of Bitbucket Cloud account passwords for app passwords (please see our Bitbucket Cloud community post for details on why we made this change for se...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find an event
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.Host an event
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local event. Learn more about Community Events