Come for the products,
stay for the community

The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.

Atlassian Community about banner
4,359,815
Community Members
 
Community Events
168
Community Groups

Would like Epic Status to change based on story's status

I have 5 columns in my board: To Do, In Progress, In Review, Blocked and Done. I'd like the Epic's status to be:

  • To Do if all stories have a status = "To Do"
  • In Progres if some some stories have a status of either "In Progress" or "In Review"
  • Blocked if any story has a status = "Blocked"
  • Done if all stories have a status = "Done"

I can't figure out why the rule doesn't work. The Epic I'm testing with has 2 stories - #1 is Done and #2 I'm testing with. I'd expect the Epic status to change to In Progress if I move story #2 to In Progress or In Review but the Epic status says To Do. Same if I move it to Blocked.

What am I missing?

My rule is as follows:

2020-12-02_18-05-34.png

 

1 answer

1 accepted

1 vote
Answer accepted
wwalser Atlassian Team Dec 17, 2020

The audit log should make what's happening in this rule fairly clear. Check out this document for more tools for debugging rules: https://support.atlassian.com/jira-software-cloud/docs/debug-a-rule/.

Once an epic fails to match the first if statement, the rule stops executing and no more of the actions or conditions are checked. These are not nested if else conditions. These are "if this is true, continue executing. Otherwise, stop executing."

We do have support for if/else style condition blocks. However, some bad news. We only support one level of nesting. This use case demonstrates a shortcoming in current automation. One that we will eventually get rid of, it's on our list of things to do, but we don't currently have it scheduled as there is more critical work going on at the moment.

Branches create a "nested" rule execution. See here:

Screen Shot 2020-12-18 at 5.26.16 pm.png

Similarly, if else blocks also create a nesting. See again:

Screen Shot 2020-12-18 at 5.29.25 pm.png

This ability to nest provides visual clarity, but it also has meaning about how the rule executes.

So, how do we solve your use case. I believe the answer is using multiple branches. It's not as elegant, but it'll get the job done.

Screen Shot 2020-12-18 at 5.43.52 pm.png

Hope this helps.

Wes

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
TAGS
Community showcase
Published in Apps & Integrations

Apps for Confluence you won't want to miss: RSVP for September's Appy Hours

Calling all collaborators and Confluence users! Our Appy Hours event on September 29th features 4 presenters demoing functionality to superpower Confluence. Don't miss learning about these apps i...

110 views 0 9
Read article

Atlassian Community Events