You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
Hello,
I have a question about prioritizing short but not urgent tasks.
On the one hand, there are critical tasks (such as system downtime or sales order stalled) or tasks that are less urgent but have a long duration of work, while on the other hand there are tasks that are not urgent (critical) but have very short working hours.
The departments that request these tasks can't wait a long time until the other tasks ahead are finished.
The question is how to prioritize tasks?
Are there any methods that help or support this issue?
Thank you.
These are really two different streams of work that should be surfaced and treated as such.
One stream sounds like a good fit for a first in first out queue in a Service Desk.
The other stream sounds like a more traditional effort where planned work is prioritized and flows across boards.
I would keep these separate and either split to two teams, or offially reduce the capacity/velocity of the build team to account for this stream of unplanned work.