You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
Howdy,
Our organization uses NFS mounts for both the SHARED home and the individual NODE home for Jira data center. There is some discussion about whether it is supported or in general a good idea. I'm hoping someone from Atlassian can settle this argument for us.
Thanks!
The top-level JIRA_HOME directory must be local, but you can relocate some of the directories to alternate locations (like NFS) with a symlink, as Atlassian advise this for relocating attachments.
I would think "caches" and "tmp" are definitely off-limits. Are the other directories fair game?
EDIT: Played around with this a bit and would add "plugins" to the list of subdirectories you definitely shouldn't move off the local disk.
The discussion I was hoping there would have been was in the forums, where you graciously provided some! Thanks!
I was mostly just trying to cement what I considered to be a generally "bad idea" as an "unsupported configuration" or even a "don't do that, it's an awful idea". We were able to convince the architect to make the change to using block devices and everything started working swimmingly. I also wanted to put this in the forums so that anyone else in my position could have a document to look at and say "see, using the local home on a network drive is a bad idea". For those of you doing that. It's a REALLY bad idea.