Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Compatibility with Grammarly

Ben Arundel
Contributor
December 8, 2022

Hey

 

I use Grammarly, and whenever I add an insight or comment, I get this problem:

Screenshot 2022-12-08 at 10.38.21.png

Grammarly suggests a change, I click on it, and this popup comes up: 

Screenshot 2022-12-08 at 10.38.29.png

I'm raising this as I don't get the problem anywhere else in JIRA or in this community tool. It seems to work with Grammarly fine. It just happens in the product discovery tool. 

3 answers

1 accepted

1 vote
Answer accepted
Stacy Smith
Contributor
February 28, 2024

@James Conway   our approach for this would be a single JPD Idea for the project (feature) with linked Epics as the delivery of the parts.  So in your scenario you might have an Epic for the Design, then an Epic for the Implementation if you want to roadmap those 'departments' separately.  The benefit of one JPD Idea is keeping all of the project parts in a tight Idea container.

In our environment we approach the project as full-stack, meaning we don't have separate JPD Ideas to segregate technical departments (research, design, infra, coding).   

0 votes
Troy Moore
Contributor
February 23, 2024

I would create a new idea for each feature and track the timeline status of each idea via the built in 'Roadmap' field within JPD. I would also suggest creating subsequent roadmap JPD views to facilitate discussion around your 'Now' and 'Next' items. For instance, In Q3 Feature A will be in the 'Now' view and Feature B will be in the 'Next' view. I've found that separation of Discovery/Design vs. Delivery has been most helpful. Creating checkpoints to ensure the movement from Next to Now is also a useful idea. Example: For Feature C, you may want to have a check field called 'Design Doc'. If the design doc is not provided, do not move to now.

The 'Now' and 'Next' views within JPD can be tailored for each type of work needed, therefore allowing you to track some fields when reviewing the 'Now' vs. the 'Next'. Whatever fields aren't relevant for 'Next' may be relevant and made viewable for 'Now' and vice-versa.

0 votes
Andy Keohane
February 23, 2024

Given those timescales, I think I'd structure it as you have there, 3 separate ideas with each one having one or more delivery epics and each epic containing the tasks or stories that need to be delivered.  Whether you split the epics by 'department' (UX design, architecture, development etc.) or by functional increment is up to you of course, but that should give you a decent handle on it

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events