A Subversion branch or tag is a copy of a particular repository path at a point in time. This is denoted as the addition of a particular path.
For example:
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1577 | dgr02 | 2016-06-01 14:13:18 +0100 (Wed, 01 Jun 2016) | 1 line Changed paths: A /tags/SVN-HOOKS-1.1 (from /branches/svn-hooks-1.x:1576) CBST-654 : Added issueType checking functionality. ------------------------------------------------------------------------
The deletion of a branch or tag is the corresponding removal of that particular path:
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r1586 | dgr02 | 2016-06-02 14:55:22 +0100 (Thu, 02 Jun 2016) | 1 line Changed paths: D /branches/CBST-417 Branch clean-up ------------------------------------------------------------------------
When users are looking to clean-up old tags they will often perform this in in en masse manner - for example (different repository):
------------------------------------------------------------------------ r42953 | luw07 | 2016-06-02 13:15:31 +0100 (Thu, 02 Jun 2016) | 1 line Changed paths: D /Database/DB_RDM/tags/snapshots/DB_RDM-106.0.19 D /Database/DB_RDM/tags/snapshots/DB_RDM-106.0.21 D /Database/DB_RDM/tags/snapshots/DB_RDM-106.0.22 D /Database/DB_RDM/tags/snapshots/DB_RDM-106.0.23 D /Database/DB_RDM/tags/snapshots/DB_RDM-106.0.31 D /Database/DB_RDM/tags/snapshots/DB_RDM-106.0.32 ... 480 additional deletions ...
This causes FishEye to get in a mess because it is unable to retrieve all of the changes associated with the revision in a suitable time. In the example above, each tag has 12,000+ paths so the whole changeset (according to FishEye) will amount to over 6,000,000 changes.
This, understandably, can cause FishEye to timeout its processing of the revision as it's SVN Operation Timeout is by default 1 hour.
For a changeset containing 1,000,000s of items it's unlikely to complete the transfer of all of this data within an hour for FishEye to then process; however whilst this would mean that the changelog would stay up to date it means that it would be continually re-attempting index the paths within this one revision.
My Question
Okay - so what I want to know is what are people's recommendations for actions which I can take which will help FishEye to cope with these kind of changesets?
Things I can come up with:
What other suggestions might folks have for how I can protect my FishEye instance / help users to work in a more intelligent manner?
Hi David,
I believe the best option would be to set an Exclude Path matching the path of the excluded tag when removing tags, then restarting (not re-indexing) the repository. To explain this a bit further, when adding an Exclude Path then just restarting the repository, FishEye will not try to index any further changes on that path - this way, you would maintain that tag indexed and showing up in your repository, but new changes, such as it deletion, wouldn't be indexed. I'm afraid it's not possible to set this programatically once you delete a tag, though, since FishEye's REST API doesn't offer an endpoint for setting exclude/include paths - for this, there's a feature request you can check at https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/FE-5718, but please notice Atlassian doesn't offer ETAs for the implementation of new features. Please feel free to vote and add any comments to it, as well as adding yourself as a watcher so you can track its progress directly. You may refer to Atlassian's policy for the implementation of new features.
Furthermore, if you don't wish the tag to display anymore in FishEye, you can set a Hidden Directory for it, which will just hide the given directory.
You can read further about Exclude Paths at https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/FISHEYE/Include+Exclude+paths and about Hidden Directories at https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/FISHEYE/Hidden+directories
Regards,
Gustavo
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.