It's not the same without you

Join the community to find out what other Atlassian users are discussing, debating and creating.

Atlassian Community Hero Image Collage

why do pages have large blank left and right panels, wasting 50% of the available space, but comment Edited

When you create a confluence page, the actual page content is so narrow that you waste half the space with large blank left and right margins. However, the pages comments use the full width, and offer the same editing features.

It's actually better to leave pages blank, and just use the comments to create the wiki content, as you get more than double the width on a 1080 screen at least.

 

PerformanceWiki.png

1 answer

1 accepted

2 votes
Answer accepted

@hob 

In the new editor, pages are fixed-width by default. The benefit of fixed-width content is that your content will look the same regardless of what screen it’s viewed on. When using full-width, the text and other page elements respond to the screen size.

You can expand the content to full-width by opening the page in edit mode and selecting the expand page full-width icon.

Screen Shot 2020-01-23 at 9.13.08 pm.png

You can make full-width as the default in your site. Please refer to Confluence Editing Improvements for more details.

Well, personally I think this a bad development.  Confluence, as a wiki, rather than a brochure website, should be full width by default.  Fixed width non-resonsivce websites went out 6 years ago for good reason.  Confluence should adapt to the screen size, like it always has.  I want function over form.  I have been unable to find a way to make my pages full screen, so they are wasting more than half the screen with white.  I dont have permissions to change any defaults, and the people who do have permission dont use the sites, its the project teams who do.  Certainly in corporate environments, noone uses mobile to view pages, only desktop, and no one cares if the two are identical, infact most would EXPECT that the content be responsive, rather than fixed width. 

Like # people like this

Along with the the loss of the "[" operator to create links to other pages, I would say the old editor is better for the task of producing clear knowledge based wikis with minium effort.

Like Veera likes this

You know it's 2020, right? You know that there are, oh, millions of resources on how to code responsive CSS, right? And you want to claim that the "benefit" of fixed-width content is that content "will look the same regardless of what screen it's viewed on" when that is demonstrably not true (nether that it's a "benefit" not the actual content behavior)?

Did no one on your team, not one UX designer, not one product manager, not one programmer, not one QA, not one technical writer, ever speak up any say just how bonehead an idea this was? I mean, this is just one of many awful design and implementation decision in your "new" editor; it's almost as if you want customers to go find a better content development solution.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
TAGS
Community showcase
Posted in Confluence

Lessons and Learnings: Six Months of Working Remote [Discussion]

Hey there, folks! For most of us, the past six months- yes, you read that right- have been a journey. More people than ever before have pivoted to working remotely, and navigating being on-scre...

8,514 views 6 6
Join discussion

Community Events

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find an event

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.

Host an event

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local event. Learn more about Community Events

Events near you