User macro for embedding of external web-page

Aliaksei Mishenin Nov 12, 2013

Is it possible to write user macro like iframe from 'Adaptavist Content Formatting' plugin or it is using some java scripts that need to be bundled with macro in plugin?

5 answers

1 accepted

0 vote

Aliaksei Mishenin Nov 13, 2013

We've made it. Works fine in 5.3.1 and 4.2.3

Macro body processing: no macro body

Template:

## Macro title: My Macro

## Macro has a body: Y or N

## Body processing: Selected body processing option

## Output: Selected output option

##

## Developed by: IT Solutions Dep

## Date created: dd/mm/yyyy

## Installed by: My Name

## @param URL:title=Url|type=string|required=true|desc=Enter include URL

## @param width:title=Width|type=string|required=true|desc=IFrame width (% or px)

## @param height:title=Height|type=string|required=true|desc=IFrame height (% or px)

## @param id:title=ID|type=string|required=true|desc=IFrame ID

<iframe src="$paramURL" height="$paramheight" width="$paramwidth" id="$paramid"></iframe>

You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.

Comment

Rachael Birky Jul 14, 2014

I developed a macro like this, but am having trouble displaying two iframe macros on a page (even with unique div ids, and even though they show in preview). Is this a problem you have also encountered?

You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.

Comment

1 vote

Davin Studer Community Champion Nov 12, 2013

Why don't you want to use Adaptavist's iframe macro? You could create a user macro that creates an iframe, but why would you want to re-invent the wheel?

You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.

Comment

Aliaksei Mishenin Nov 12, 2013

Because this plugin doesn't support current 5.3.1 version of Confluence and we can't just sit and wait when Adaptavist will update this plugin.

You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.

Comment

Davin Studer Community Champion Nov 13, 2013

Have you tried it on 5.3 yet? Often times it only says it is not compatible because the author hasn't updated the listing to say it is compatible. I could very well still be compatible and with what it is doing (not using a lot of framework stuff) I would imagine it still works.