I am testing sharing some of our confluence content to external users.
I've added an external email address, and the linkis shared, but it then prompts the user to login. They don't have an account. The page specifically states:
"The recipients can be Confluence users or any email addresses."
How can they access the information?
Hi @Tim Chapman,
We're about to release the v2.0 of Share Attachments for Confluence. In this new version, we allow the sharing of pages with non-confluence users, so you can send any page without giving public access to your Confluence instance.
This one has killed me and have been slowly transitioning to Google Docs, which is actually working out pretty nicely so far. I feel like Atlassian is missing the mark on newer companies who are lean and work with consultants and end-users directly. But maybe that's just me.
I work with a lot of people from contract manufacturers to beta testers to end users to retailers. They all need access to various bits and it's turning out I need to have a particular users I trust have access to an otherwise private area. Usually these folks aren't employees but end users who are interested in helping develop a product along side. With Google I just enter their email and the permissions heirarchy is as simple as adding it to a folder. I can even have a 'share link' and anyone with that link can see it immediately. No setup or manually creating accounts.
Then there's the licensing issue of taking up seats per account and I'd quickly be paying for lots of users that individually rarely use the tool.
I've done the export thing and that's, well, only read-only and the export is very basic. Some of the pictures don't land right and I also put videos on some pages.
It's just not a very 'sharey' tool. Any public spaces are just that - public and it's the whole space which can be dangerous when you have to go in and restrict individual pages after the fact. There is an area between private/secure and public. And full private is easier to setup on something like Drive as well. All you need is an email. Login issues and me forgetting to unrestrict or set up permissions on a particular page have ended up costing some time and some folks kinda don't want to deal with any of that. The end users in particular (who are being generous to me with their time in the first place) don't want to have to create new accounts and login to a tool that is new to them. Most folks kinda just don't do it. And since they aren't employees I cannot demand anything. So it's got to be easy so I get more folks writing and reading.
So to answer, it's both. Maybe I've missed something major here but I do not think this has been addressed considering no solution has been offered to the OP since 4 years ago outside of the server-based and paid for add-on. So I think it's time to bail, unfortunately.
@Ann Worley +1
Is it possible to share a single page to a existing user which doesn't have access to that space? Because for me it doesn't work. After inserting username and pressing the share button I get a green checkmark, but then when I press the share icon again there are no users in there. And the user get a error message when he wants to access the page (not available).
@Ann Worley So when I understood you right, it's not possible to share just a single page from a space to a user when it doesn't have permissions to that page. So why you implement a share button that it's not a share button at all??
It's really bad that I have to give access the user to the whole space and then restrict all other pages so that he can see just the only one page. Because every time you create a new page you have to restrict access for the user again and it has to come into your mind to do this. Both things are a very bad user experience :-/
All cloud sites have this functionality to give access to a single page but you don't?? When do you plan to implement this "state-of-the-art" feature???
@Nic Brough [Adaptavist], ok, yes but why just restrict it to these users? I can understand it from the point of security in a huge company where the users shouldn't share details from one space to other users. But the admin wo has the rights to change permission should be able to add an "opt-in" for a single page for selected users. This is a basic functionality for iCloud, Google drive, Nextcloud, Dropbox,... and so on. Atlassian marketing is saying that you can put all your files from that services into confluence because it's easier (and it is) but they don't have this pretty basic functionality within Confluence??
Thanks, Nic. Just testing the software to migrate to from another wiki and within an hour of testing, this is already an issue for me. Single source of truth for content curating and document management optimally means flexible and nimble view and share policies. I want to create some documents which are internal and external at the same time. E.g. I might want a single environment policy that i can share a link to externally to view without sign in, have internally for staff, and embed on a our webpage and be publicly visible.
Hi @Mauro Ezequiel Fernandez Badii
@Tim Chapman is askings something different, Sharing a page with external non-confluence user. Like you can do on Google Docs with Share-Link. Something which I also would like to see. Same as my collegues.
Setting up public access for the whole wiki or even a space is not an option. ONLY a secret link for a single Page
@Gorka Puente [Comalatech] unfortunatly your tool does not work with cloud based Confluence OnDemand
Hi there - I'm a product manager for Confluence Cloud. Thank you for your comments on this discussion thread, and for the feedback on the use cases where privately sharing with anonymous users is crucial.
As per Ann's earlier comments, there is a feature suggestion open for this where you can comment and vote: https://jira.atlassian.com/browse/CONFCLOUD-32999.
This feature isn't on the Confluence Cloud roadmap, however it hasn't been ruled out for inclusion at some point in the future. It is clear that this type of sharing would be a useful feature, which is why the suggestion hasn't been closed.
It seems to me that people have been asking for this since 2014 and clearly there is a need. I notice that someone has even developed an external plugin (unfortunately just for the server solution I gather). So I don't understand why this feature isn't on the roadmap for cloud. Perhaps not a high priority for you, but still worthy of road mapping.
From my point of view, it is yet another reason for me to look for a solution elsewhere. And bit by bit I get to the point where Atlassian just no longer rates on my radar. This feature could help with stickiness for your customers, but it's just pushing me away. First helpdesk ticketing now knowledge base ... once I move those away, I could then question whether Jira has a place in our business.
@Caroline Bartle Please consider how many people have posted in this thread, and for how long. I 100% do not want to trust a sharing feature to a Third-Party plugin, and even if I did, we use Confluence Cloud and wouldn't be able to use Comalatech's solution anyways. I really liked writing tutorials and guides in Confluence but if I can't share them with non-atlassian members on an ad-hoc basic I won't be able to use Confluence.
Update: There is an add on in the marketplace for this, but it's not free and is only for the server version of Confluence, which doesn't help those of us using the cloud solution.
Surely there has to be a better answer to this?
Not really, since exporting the pages makes an absolute mess of formatting a lot of the time, and is limited to Word or PDF. Also means we have to export and import constantly to update, which completely defeats the point of Confluence (intended to reduce our use of emailing documentation back and forth!).
To me this is a serious oversight on Atlassian's part. As mentioned in other comments, even free services like Google Docs allows this kind of sharing!
There is a suggestion ticket open, requesting the ability to share pages as you are describing: Ability to share a page to an anonymous user with a private URL
Since the suggestion is on our public-facing bug tracker you can add comments and vote, to communicate directly with the development team responsible for adding features.
These bugs were created over 3 years ago, and the latest comment, which isn't even from the dev team, is from over 2 months ago. This is simply not at all helpful - just redirecting the problem to someone else. When can we expect to actually see any work happening on this feature? I am amazed that this ticket can be untouched for YEARS, while we were given an entirely new UI experience recently that absolutely nobody asked for. Maybe refocus the dev efforts to something actually helpful?
Confluence's collaboration features are awesome, and so is the goal to centralize knowledge and information. Understandably licensing is part of the business model, and most sharing occurs between internal users, but we all share information externally!
But without anonymous external sharing of individual pages, our users will just default to duplicating content (no!) in a free competitor's platform, such as Google Drive or OneDrive.
From the IT side, it makes alternatives more appealing to not have to provision new users anytime someone wants to share externally, or worry a plugin will break on an upgrade. Sharepoint, heck, even the open source Documize has external sharing with link expiration.
While the aforementioned alternatives offer "free" external user access, even offering cheap buckets of "external user licenses" limited to x pages would be better than nothing.
On the upside, it might drive actually drive additional license purchases to avoid "Who is Anonymous Aardvark", and might get new users to see how great Confluence is and tell their teams about it!
Atlassian Team, what do you all use when you need to collaborate externally with an external partner on a just a single or few pages ... do you provision new users and futz around with permissions?
+1 for this feature. I understand the complexity of sharing a page with external non confluence users if the page has links to other Confluence pages.
But atleast to start with, we should get this feature without thinking about links to other Confluence pages within shared page.
NO! Implementing a botch without thinking about security would be fatal.
It would be illegal to do this to Confluence in the second largest Atlassian marketplace and soon the third as well (unless it could be globally disabled, in which case you might as well not implement it)
PLEASE, think about data security before making silly statements like that.
Why is this marked *solved*? It is not solved.
I have recommended Confluence many times in the past, but today as an influencer, I can no longer recommend Confluence--this is one of many reasons.
By not addressing the awkward roles and rights mgmt, (and other long-standing short-comings) Atlassian is begging for people to go elsewhere. They create an opportunity for better solutions which have addressed these and other flaws.
My current company is very unlikely to pick Confluence.
Hi Community! Kesha (kay-sha) from the Confluence marketing team here! Can you share stories with us on how your non-technical (think Marketing, Sales, HR, legal, etc.) teams are using Confluen...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find a group
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no AUG chapters near you at the moment.Start an AUG