You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
According to the description provided in the documentation, the return value should be the page object of the copied page. Unfortunately in confiforms 3.3.1 it does not return the page object of the copied page (aka the new page) but the one of the page that has been copied - which does not make any sense.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
OK, I see
Checking the code we can confirm it is a bug - the API we use does not report correctly the page
We will look into alternatives to see what can be done and how to figure out the page that has been created using this "deep copy" API method (complexity is in the page title conflict resolver Confluence uses... so the copied page might have a different name)
Alex
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Yes, it does
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Alex Medved _ConfiForms_ ,
unfortunately copy page does not work in my case either.
When copying a page within a the same space, it claims that a page with the given name already exists in that space. Renaming mechanisms as implemented when performing a manual copy is not implemented.
This makes the entire copy page functionality rather useless...
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
That is quite a bold and strong statement and I am not here to change your mind. Useless it is...
The idea of a copy page IFTTT is to copy a page that has a title that contains some references via [entry.field_name] notations so these will be processed against the current record and that will make a unique title
Alex
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi Alex,
indeed you changed my mind...
I haven't been aware that one may use [entry.field_name] notations in the page title - that's an important game changer!
Would be great if this would be documented somewhere where a user can find it, e.g. on https://wiki.vertuna.com/display/CONFIFORMS/Configuring+ConfiForms+IFTTT+actions+and+rules#ConfiguringConfiFormsIFTTTactionsandrules-CopyAttachment.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Good point. We will update the docs
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.