Issues with Confiforms rule logic

[Simon Larson]

Hi, we're having some issues with the logic behind our field definition rules. To troubleshoot this, we created a new basic Confiform with simply a text field and a hidden value. There is also a rule that sets the value of the hidden field if the text field is empty. This is the configuration of the rule:

Problem is, the condition ALWAYS triggers, no matter the input. This is the form data after our testing:

Why is the upper entry also triggering the rule condition? I tried negating the expression to !userinput:[empty] but then it NEVER triggers.

Thankful for any response.

[Jonas Andersson · Accepted solution]

Works as it should (i.e all labels are added) i insert them on a confluence page like:

apache modproxy rewrite

Not sure how you did it, but works fine in 5.10.2. You could elaborate more on what version you are using, browser, JSD, errors in logs, cloud or server.. This one-liner helps noone i am afraid.

[Ivan Sergreevitch]

I've got the same issue. Have you found any solution?