BitBucket's documentation says that they support a limited set of HTML tags for READMEs, but they never say what tags. I'm trying to embed an image using the <img> tag for control over image size, which Markdown doesn't support, but it shows up as the text for the HTML, ie. as <img src='mypicture.jpeg' width='100' height='100'> instead of the picture.
Hi Paul! You can find more information about the HTML tags that can be used at http://spec.commonmark.org/0.21/#html-tag. Regarding images, you can jump directly to the section 6.6.
Hope this helps :)
Ana
Hi Ana,
Thank you for this information. It's unfortunate that BitBucket does not support <img> tags for sizing images. It's something I've grown accustomed to on GitHub and am dissapointed with the lack of formatting that BitBucket offers for documentation.
Paul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
It seems that Bitbucket Markdown does not support html-entities like , and literally displays it as , not as non-breaking space.
This is really awkward: I wrote a huge Readme.md with hundreds of s, and in IntelliJ IDEA preview all works as expected. But on Bitbucket the layout displays as totally broken :(
Is there a plan/issue to fix this?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I have the same issue as Dmitry for html entities in the readme file
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Any Plans for this?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
After importing a project from GitHub which has README documentation with loads of HTML in markdown, I can't view it properly here. It's a shame because I wanted to move out of GitHub. You should support html in markdown 👍
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
^bump.
I am considering moving my repo over to Github from having to deal with this issue. It is unfortunate that re-sizing an image in a repo is not supported by Bitbucket. IMO, resizing an image is an essential & basic feature to include in a repo readme. I will explore other options, but have already wasted 20 minutes scouring the web for something that should be a simple add on.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
No, Bitbucket Server displays an HTML hyperlink as code, even though the CommonMark spec says it is interpreted as HTML.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
bitbucket is becoming more of an obsolete, outdated and dinasour of a system.. we're definitely moving .. something as stupid and simple as an image sizing takes ages to ship not to mention tons of other issues that take ages to solve. very frustrating
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Created an awesome README in Github. Bitbucket.....please consider support proper HTML in your READMEs.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Markdown footnotes don't seem to work either in Atlassian's bitbucket ticketing system.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Any updates???
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Plz fix
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Not being able to size and/or float images is a PITA.
I'd really like to see this functionality added
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I always struggle with how bitbucket interprets markdown as well. My main concern is there is no way to check what it will look like other than actually push the changes. Not even https://atlaskit.atlassian.com/examples/editor/editor-markdown-transformer/markdown-transformer consistent with how bitbucket displays markdown. Is there any other tool I can use?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
The least bad solution I've settled on is a vscode extension hbrok.markdown-preview-bitbucket
Note: now that there is an atlassian-maintained vscode integration: atlascode, maybe[?] something more official may be available one day. You could open an issue or make feature request i suppose
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Simply infuriating...
Thank you for the links, will try it out. This should be fixed, it is always a guessing game with the bitbucket markdown.
Edit 1: The vscode plugin seems to show markdown correctly, unlike the bitbucket server once viewed online.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
No delete answer?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.