Hello,
This is a step of my yml file :
- step: &build-deploy-dev
name: 'Build + Deployment - DEV'
size: 2x
caches:
- node
deployment: test
script:
- npm run build-prod
- pipe: atlassian/sftp-deploy:0.5.4
variables:
USER: $USER
SERVER: $SERVER
REMOTE_PATH: '/var/www/html/'
LOCAL_PATH: 'dist/*'
EXTRA_ARGS: 'rm *'
I'm trying to delete the files previously deployed on the remote server before copying the new ones but the EXTRA_ARGS command doesn't work :/.
Because the build-prod command generate files like : main.js?qd87dz8z25zd4
The number at the end changes at each build, so i need to clean up the remote folder in order to prevent to have a lot of main.js?XXXXXX outdated.
The downside of using a rm here is that there's a short time when your web site isn't available. Also, if the later deployment phase stops (e.g. due to failure) your web site is down. Another approach that is worth considering is this:
You can extend this to also have a simple rollback by having an 'old' link. To rollback, a script would move all the symbolic links back. Old can't really change though and you need to think through changing the links there.
The problem is solved by the ssh-run pipeline :
- pipe: atlassian/ssh-run:0.2.4
variables:
SSH_USER: $USER
SERVER: $SERVER
COMMAND: 'rm -rf /var/www/html/*'
DEBUG: 'false'
- pipe: atlassian/sftp-deploy:0.5.4
variables:
USER: $USER
SERVER: $SERVER
REMOTE_PATH: '/var/www/html/'
LOCAL_PATH: 'dist/*'
DEBUG: 'false'
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Sorry for refloating this old post...
I'm confronted with the same situation and would really appreciate a more detailed "instructions".
The symlink to the current deployment: can I update automatically as part of my pipeline in the last step?
The version to which to redirect the symlink: can that be updated automatically with some random generator?
For removing all folders from old deployments: should I set up a linux job for that? How do I exclude the folder that is currently being referenced in the symlink?
Thanks much!
Julian
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.