I have git on my local computer where I am developing. I can commit changes ..etc. and push those commits to bitbucket.
But confused how am I supposed to then push these changes to my production server? I tried init --bare on my servers local directory and pulling the repo but git didnt like it.
Ideally, I just want to push commits to Bitbucket from local computer and then push changes to production server.
What is the standard practice?
I think that's what you want:
Develop locally and 1.) commit to your local repsoitory - 2.) push your local repository to your Bitbucket server - and 3.) have those pushes available on your production server
In this case Bitbucket Server holds your CENTRAL repository - every developer should push his changes to this server. Everone who needs the CENTRAL repository (even your production server) should pull it from Bitbucket server.
For your production server you can either
1.) pull the repository manually
2.) set up an automated "Pull": Each time you do a push to your central repository, your production machine is notified and pulls the repository on notification. Bitbucket Server offers serval plugins to support the notification process - the one I use is Http Request Post Receive Hook: each time a push is made, a configured URL is contacted, submitting some info. On my production machine I have set up a little web server, waiting for this HTTP-Request. On receiving the HTPP-Request I evaluate the given parameters and perform an action (for example: pulling the repository ...)
Summary: Your production machine has to be notified about "pushes" to central repository (by using a post-receive-hook within Bitbucket Server) - after getting the notification, your production server has to react correspondingly (for example by pulling the repository).
Nice! Thanks for sharing workflow. I'm not sure if I can setup the auto push alert to production server on my Media Server DV host. It's using the Plesk Panel and has a component install that can help set up a git connection.
The database sync confusing / stresses me out. May try it with a hello world wp install.
Bitbucket is the central point here, that's where your code lives. You clone your repo from Bitbucket to your workstation, make the changes and push the changes back to Bitbucket. Once you have code that you think is ready for primetime you'd clone the repo onto your production server (or pull changes if you've cloned the repository already).
Premier Support Engineer
Hi Christian - or anyone with the Premier Support Engineer status :)
Your answer is exactly what the question was in the first place, but it doesn't say how . Unfortunately I'm stuck as well and the settings of my repo in Bitbucket is not helpful - do I need to put in Access keys, a Webhook, or Pipeline with SSH keys?
I have been searching for a more "elegant" solution, using hooks. However, we are using Windows, and I came up with a down-and-dirty solution that, while requiring some tweaking from time to time, has been working for us.
Our developers develop locally, and push to Bitbucket Server. Our next hop is to internal development "test" servers. I have project-specific repositories on those servers, "pull" scripts for each project, and project-specific scheduled tasks in Windows Task Scheduler. The tasks run on 1-minute intervals. This process is reliable 95+ percent of the time, as there is a problem where, after days, weeks, months of working, the tasks stop running. Re-entering the trigger time and date corrects the issue.
This flaw is why I would like to find a more"push" oriented solution. My hang-up is the configuration of what I have seen described (including above) as "a little web server, waiting for this HTTP-Request." I know how to configure IIS, but cannot find details on the rest of the setup.
Inertia ("hey, it works good enough...") is making this a lower priority, but I would like to make this work, as we would ultimately like to have a form of automated deployment up to and including production.
You shouldn't use git init --bare since option bare is a "special" option for repository servers (see for example: http://www.saintsjd.com/2011/01/what-is-a-bare-git-repository/) - and you don't want to be your production machine to be a repository server (Bitbucket server uses bare repositories - as this is a repository server)
You cannot checkout from a bare repository - you are only able to clone it. (as far as I understood git)
So: just omitt the option --bare and try it again ...
Thanks for all the answers. So if I need to do a pull from my production server (I prefer manual) then the following should have worked:. Git init --bare then git add remote origin (link to bitbucket repository) then git pull --all. But this doesn't work? Error not branch found
I am talking about committing locally and then a push to origin at Bitbucket repository.
Want I want to do is once I am happy with changes locally I want to push all the changes to my staging environment on a server.
I thought I could just pull the updated Bitbucket repository from my staging server but doesnt work.
Hey Community! We’re willing to wager that quite a few of you not only use Bitbucket, but administer it too. Our team is excited to share that we’ll be releasing improvements throughout this month of...
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!Find an event
Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!
Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.Host an event
You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local event. Learn more about Community Events