Hi! Bitbucket uses git under the hood and git is an excellent place to store text files, such as Dockerfile. It does support storing binary files but it is not a good match for Docker images.
You can probably save the Docker image using docker save and commit that - but instead I suggest you take a look for a real container registry. Here are a few (in no particular order):
- https://docs.docker.com/registry/
- https://cloud.google.com/container-registry/
- https://azure.microsoft.com/en-au/services/container-registry/
Thank you very much for your concern reply, is there any artifactory which may store docker images
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi,
Looks like Jfrog may be one. They have several articles on Artifactory and Docker integration:
I hope this helps.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks Mark! Seeing where the market is heading lately, are you planning to build a registry in BitBucket itself? That would be really helpful
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Just to add weight to this thread - gitlab has had its own internal container registry for a long time and it feels like bitbucket is behind the curve here.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Nowadays, there are already quite a few alternatives to docker hub.
Here are some examples:
hub.docker.com - 1 private repo
GitHub - ?
GitLab - repository size limit is 10GB.
This Harbor based c8n.io by Container-Registry. - 1 GB free private repo
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.