Assuming we have 100 developers to use Git. But we don't need so many to log in stash. Could I purchase 25 licenses for who to manage the repository?
Yes, assuming that only 25 will be named users in Stash. A user is per login name.
Licensing fees are quoted per total number of 'Stash users'. A Stash user is by definition any user account in the Stash system with the 'use' permission, i.e. anyone who can view the site while logged in.
Hope that helps.
<th> </th> <th> </th> <th> </th> <th> </th> <th> </th> <th colspan="8"> </th><th> </th> <th> </th> <th> </th> <th> </th>You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Thanks for the clarification. Good to know.
I guess the Stash Licensing FAQ needs update?
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
It's actually covered in the FAQ.
A Stash user is by definition any user account in the Stash system with the 'use' permission.
The "use" permission is required to gain write-access to Stash. Probably doesn't hurt to be more explicit about that.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Perhaps this is a better reference Jens?
https://confluence.atlassian.com/display/STASH/Using+repository+permissions
Three types of permissions:
Never ever heard of 'use' permissions as a contextual word in repos or filesystems - is that a permissions 'term' that you use at Atlassian only?
Regardless, your clarification is an important distinction and valid point compared with my first answer - so yes, FAQ could be clearer to this, I guess, since it came up.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.