nav[aria-label="Primary Navigation"] { padding: 0; & ul { list-style: none; width: 100%; display: flex; flex-direction: row; justify-content: start; align-items: start; gap: 30px; padding: 0; & li { margin: 0; } & ul li { list-style: none; } } }

Can not use yaml anchors in pipeline

Nativ Issac

Hey All!

I'm pretty new to bitbucket pipelines, so the following may seem trivial but anyway..

Tryin to declare the following bitbucket-pipelines.yml file:

definitions:
steps:
    - step: &black
      name: Black Format Check
image: python:3.7
script:
        - pip install black
        - black --check .
    - step: &mypy
      name: mypy Check
image: python:3.7
script:
        - pip install mypy
        - mypy src
    - step: &flake8
      name: flake8 Lint Check
image: python:3.7
script:
        - pip install flake8 flake8-bugbear
        - flake8 -v .
    - step: &pylint
      name: pylint Lint Check
image: python:3.7
script:
        - pip install pylint
        - pylint src


pipelines:
pull-requests:
feature/*:
      - parallel:
        - step: *black
        - step: *mypy
        - step: *flake8
        - step: *pylint

But the pycharm states that

Schema validation: Property 'parallel' is not allowed

Interesting considering when checked using the online validator I see it's valid $:\$

Have I miss used yaml anchors?

Thanks in advance for your help

Accepted answers

Soumyadeep Mandal - SaM

Hi @Nativ Issac ,

Welcome to the community!

Will you please have a look at this documentation and follow it!

https://support.atlassian.com/bitbucket-cloud/docs/yaml-anchors/

Some ore resources

https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Bitbucket-questions/Help-with-YAML-anchors-for-parallel-steps-in-bitbucket-pipeline/qaq-p/1174674

https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Bitbucket-questions/Bitbucket-pipeline-using-multiple-anchors/qaq-p/1124020

https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Bitbucket-questions/Pipelines-Anchors-Aliases-for-Script-Command-Snippets/qaq-p/1051313

Regards,

Soumyadeep

All comments

Soumyadeep Mandal - SaM

Hi @Nativ Issac ,

Welcome to the community!

Will you please have a look at this documentation and follow it!

https://support.atlassian.com/bitbucket-cloud/docs/yaml-anchors/

Some ore resources

https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Bitbucket-questions/Help-with-YAML-anchors-for-parallel-steps-in-bitbucket-pipeline/qaq-p/1174674

https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Bitbucket-questions/Bitbucket-pipeline-using-multiple-anchors/qaq-p/1124020

https://community.atlassian.com/t5/Bitbucket-questions/Pipelines-Anchors-Aliases-for-Script-Command-Snippets/qaq-p/1051313

Regards,

Soumyadeep

Nativ Issac

@Soumyadeep Mandal - SaM Thanks a lot!

Appreciate your quick & informative response

For the record, problem was that I declared the steps as list items.

Fix was to convert them to sub keys:

definitions:
black-step: &black
      name: Black Format Check
image: python:3.7
script:
        - pip install black
        - black --check .
mypy-step: &mypy
      name: mypy Check
image: python:3.7
script:
        - pip install mypy
        - mypy src
flake8-step: &flake8
      name: flake8 Lint Check
image: python:3.7
script:
        - pip install flake8 flake8-bugbear
        - flake8 -v .
pylint-step: &pylint
      name: pylint Lint Check
image: python:3.7
script:
        - pip install pylint
        - pylint src


pipelines:
pull-requests:
feature/*:
      - parallel:
        - step: *black
        - step: *mypy
        - step: *flake8
        - step: *pylint

Thanks again!

Francis Poulin_t6mbge

Hi @Nativ Issac ,

I'm currently facing an issue similar to yours and I'm not sure how your solution fixed the issue.

I understand that you changed your step definitions from an array to mapped objects, but this should't affect the referenced object.

In both exemple, *black should have the same value.

Note: I just saw that in your first example, the indentation for the step is wrong (i think)

definitions:
steps:
    - step: &black
      name: Black Format Check

Should be:

definitions:
steps:
    - step: &black
        name: Black Format Check

Cheers,

Nativ Issac

@Francis Poulin Hi, thanks for letting me (and perhaps some more future readers) know.

Our pipelines are already implemented in the mapped objects approach and it does not bother me that much..

Have not checked your suggestion, but I hope it suites your needs.

Welcome!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Quick Links

Find more posts tagged with

cloud

bitbucket

bitbucket-cloud

bitbucket-pipelines