Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in

Earn badges and make progress

You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.

Deleted user Avatar
Deleted user

Level 1: Seed

25 / 150 points

Next: Root


1 badge earned


Participate in fun challenges

Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!


Gift kudos to your peers

What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.


Rise up in the ranks

Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!


Come for the products,
stay for the community

The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.

Atlassian Community about banner
Community Members
Community Events
Community Groups

Bitbucket shows unexpected diff


I created a feature brunch from a tag of the master branch I made changes in one file which are also changed in the master branch. If i create a pullrequest i expect that both files (on actual master branch and the feature branch) are the same, but i get a diff wich looks like bitbucket diffs against the tag on the master branch and not the actual version. Can anybody tell me why it shows the diff?




File on master


File on feature branch

feature.JPGNetwork view




2 answers

1 accepted

1 vote
Answer accepted
Kristy Atlassian Team May 23, 2018

Hi @Jens Müller,


On the 'Create Pull Request' page and the 'Compare Branch' page Bitbucket Server shows a 'common ancestor' diff (also known as a 2-way diff). This diff finds the commit that is common to both the source and target branches (known as the common ancestor commit) and compares the latest commit on the source branch with the common ancestor commit. This means that the diff you see does not contain any of the changes from the target branch that happened after you branched.


However, if in the diff view of a created pull request Bitbucket shows the effective diff (also known as a 3-way diff). To show this diff, Bitbucket creates a temporary merge between the source and target branch, and then shows you the diff between that merge commit and the tip of the target branch. This means that the changes you are seeing in a pull request contain the changes from the target branch and represent what the target branch will look like after you perform the merge.


The article 'A better pull request' explains this concept really well.


Hope that helps!


Also, in the example you used you will find that the pull request will have a merge conflict because both the source and the target branch modified the same line of the same file.

Hi @Kristy thanks for the answer. Can you explain why there are different merge methods? it is very confusing for me.

Also it confused me that the target commit id is shown as  faf836af17b  which is the latest commit on master.

Also i see no information about a merge conflict. It Shows only "No changes" on the "created pull" page

Thank you for this answer, but FWIW, I HATE this.  Our team has had numerous PRs with diffs where we were sure we put a change into an env, only to see it reappear in a diff.  This got us into trouble a few times, as we just assumed something was awry.  Only now discovering that BB renders the diff for a PR differently than a diff for a branches comparison.  


While I don't understand this, I really would prefer some note in the UI or some setting to specify which we prefer.  In our case, the 3-way diff is NOT what we want.


PS I am talking about BBCloud, not BBServer, which has the same/similar problem.

For anyone reading this post v7 (2020):

unfortunately Bitbucket disabled 3-way diff in v7  resulting in "incorrect" diff mentioned in this question to becomes new standard, i.e. 2-way diff.

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer

Atlassian Community Events