BitBucket Data Center on AWS - Why the nodes are placed only in one AZ ?

Question

In this architecture diagram -

https://aws.amazon.com/quickstart/architecture/bitbucket/

I see that the BitBucket nodes are placed only on one AZ.

Ideally in a HA setup, the nodes should be installed in both Availability Zones ... Am I right?

Can someone help to clarify this?

Christian Glockner · Answer

Hi Karthik,

Bitbucket Server will only work in environments where you can guarantee very low latency, which is why we only support environments where all nodes are in the same physical location - and different availability zones typically aren't in the same location.

You can of course try it - chances are it will work, but be prepared to move everything to same AZ after all in case you are experiencing problems.

Cheers,

Christian

Premier Support Engineer

Atlassian

Karthikeyan Kaliappan · Answer

I just got a response from our AWS architect.

Since HA is our prime goal, with zero-down-time, he suggest this:

"Multi AZ have a little impact on the performance as compared to single AZ but it will be very minor (sub-millisecond). However, only extreme-low-latency use cases fit the single-AZ model. Thus, you can consider spanning the nodes across AZs to build a HA solution"

So I would like to double-check with Atlassian, if there is any "risk" involved in splitting the BitBucket nodes across multi-AZ in AWS, to accomplish HA?

Would this cause any Git transaction failure / mis-behavior?

Regards,

Karthik

Karthikeyan Kaliappan · Answer

I got it. It now makes sense.

We are actually interested to host all 3 products - BitBucket, Jira and Cloud Data centers on AWS ... and roll it out enterprise wide.

Wondering whether we can place all the 3 clusters in the same AZ and build it out together. Does it make sense?

Regards.