You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
Greetings,
something changed between 0.3.1 -> 0.3.1 when parsing a report's xml.
The pmd report was with version pmd 1.30 with the paramters "--format xslt --property xsltFilename=pmd/pmd-to-checkstyle.xsl --rulesets pmd/coe_pmd_ruleset.xml -language apex --report-file pmd/pmd-result.xml --fail-on-violation false".
SEVERE: Error when parsing /opt/atlassian/pipelines/agent/build/pmd-result.xml as se.bjurr.violations.lib.parsers.CheckStyleParser content:
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<file xmlns:pmd="http://pmd.sourceforge.net/report/2.0.0"
name="/opt/atlassian/pipelines/agent/build/force-app/main/default/classes/arlanisUtilities/ClsRecordTypeUtil.cls">
<error line="22" column="38" severity="info"
message="Missing or mismatched ApexDoc @param"
source="https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.49.0/pmd_rules_apex_documentation.html#apexdoc"/>
<error line="134" column="30" severity="info" message="Missing ApexDoc comment"
source="https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.49.0/pmd_rules_apex_documentation.html#apexdoc"/>
<error line="141" column="30" severity="info" message="Missing ApexDoc comment"
source="https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.49.0/pmd_rules_apex_documentation.html#apexdoc"/>
<error line="152" column="30" severity="info" message="Missing ApexDoc comment"
source="https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.49.0/pmd_rules_apex_documentation.html#apexdoc"/>
<error line="173" column="30" severity="info"
message="Missing or mismatched ApexDoc @param"
source="https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.49.0/pmd_rules_apex_documentation.html#apexdoc"/>
</file>
<file xmlns:pmd="http://pmd.sourceforge.net/report/2.0.0"
name="/opt/atlassian/pipelines/agent/build/force-app/main/default/classes/arlanisUtilities/ClsRecordTypeUtil_Test.cls">
<error line="63" column="10" severity="info"
message="'System.assertEquals' should have 3 parameters."
source="https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.49.0/pmd_rules_apex_bestpractices.html#apexassertionsshouldincludemessage"/>
<error line="73" column="10" severity="info"
message="'System.assertEquals' should have 3 parameters."
source="https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.49.0/pmd_rules_apex_bestpractices.html#apexassertionsshouldincludemessage"/>
<error line="76" column="10" severity="info"
message="'System.assertEquals' should have 3 parameters."
source="https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.49.0/pmd_rules_apex_bestpractices.html#apexassertionsshouldincludemessage"/>
<error line="79" column="10" severity="info"
message="'System.assertEquals' should have 3 parameters."
source="https://pmd.github.io/pmd-6.49.0/pmd_rules_apex_bestpractices.html#apexassertionsshouldincludemessage"/>
</file>
...more rules...
javax.xml.stream.XMLStreamException: ParseError at [row,col]:[17,2]
Message: The markup in the document following the root element must be well-formed.
at com.sun.org.apache.xerces.internal.impl.XMLStreamReaderImpl.next(XMLStreamReaderImpl.java:604)
at se.bjurr.violations.lib.parsers.CheckStyleParser.parseReportOutput(CheckStyleParser.java:41)
at se.bjurr.violations.lib.reports.ViolationsFinder.findViolations(ViolationsFinder.java:35)
at se.bjurr.violations.lib.ViolationsApi.violations(ViolationsApi.java:103)
at com.atlassian.bitbucket.pipelines.checkstyle.report.Main.main(Main.java:99)
I think XML was not enforced before to be well-formed and it might be an issue with our pmd-to-checkstyle.xsl.
The issue was with the report.xml. It was missing a starting and enclosing tag.
@Frederik Mann hi. Can you confirm that all works on checkstyle-report 0.3.1 but not in version 0.3.2? We bumped violations lib from version 1.116 to 1.149
Regards, Igor.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hi @Igor Stoyanov , yes I can confirm that everything works when switching back from 0.3.2 to 0.3.1.
The very same report, then can be evaluated by checkstyle-report and is shown in the pipeline with results.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.