I have a complaint about how Bitbucket describes automated approval retraction for a changed Pull Request.
Right now, there isn't a distinction in the PR history or notifications between a reviewing user that deliberately retracts their approval versus when the PR automatically retracts that approval upon the branch receiving a new commit. Since the reviewer isn't the one actually un-approving the PR, the text as currently shown is incorrect, as it states that the approval retraction was that user's own action.
Make a pull request for a branch with commits.
Add a reviewer. We'll call her "Barb".
Have "Barb" approve the request.
Push a new commit to the branch.
What currently happens:
I receive a notification that "Barb" has marked the PR as unapproved.
The PR overview/history shows that "Barb" marked the PR as unapproved.
What should happen:
The notification should communicate in some manner that Bitbucket has retracted Barb's approval (and the approval of any other reviewers) because a new commit was added to the branch.
The PR overview/history should also show that Bitbucket retracted all approval(s) because a new commit was added to the branch.