You're on your way to the next level! Join the Kudos program to earn points and save your progress.
Level 1: Seed
25 / 150 points
Next: Root
1 badge earned
Challenges come and go, but your rewards stay with you. Do more to earn more!
What goes around comes around! Share the love by gifting kudos to your peers.
Keep earning points to reach the top of the leaderboard. It resets every quarter so you always have a chance!
Join now to unlock these features and more
The Atlassian Community can help you and your team get more value out of Atlassian products and practices.
On the how-to page of how to add a GPG key to your bitbucket account, the instruction states:
From within Bitbucket Server, go to your account by clicking your profile picture in the upper-right, and select Manage account.
The profile picture is in the lower-left corner, and selecting "Bitbucket settings" which appears to be the closest choice to "Manage account" in the list, there is nothing about GPG keys, only SSH keys, and GPG key adding is not in there.
Hi James, do you have any idea when this will be supported in the cloud version?
Also a vote feature for the community will be great, cos i want to vote up the @David Pilkington question :D
gitlab.com has a lot of features, including gpg support, and it is open source.
+1
Both gitlab and github support GPG. Would be nice to have it in bitbucket as well.
We just moved to BB from GH, was surprised not to find this feature :( in BB Cloud, any update @jredmond ?
Surprised as well. GitHub and Gitlab the two main competitor have them already.
+1
Wow, I just spent some time looking for this in settings and profile, because I wanted to allow only signed commits. Coming from Bitbucket Server, I expected that this feature will be available, I am rather disappointed.
Is adding support planned anytime soon?
This is some major suckage... especially since both gitlab and github support it, even your server offering.
Thanks! At the time of voting, it seems that 'only' 260+ people voted for this issue... which was opened in 2011!
That's pretty typical for security features like this. I've rarely seen devs using signed commits.
EDIT: the comment in the wrong place