Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Sign up Log in

It's not the same without you

Join the community to find out what other Atlassian users are discussing, debating and creating.

Atlassian Community Hero Image Collage

Add determinate merge strategies for explicit branches

Why does BitBucket not allow merge strategies to be applied to specific branches in a repository? Traditionally, I would handle this through my own scripting, and hooks; however, there is no such granularity with BitBucket. This is what I would like to be able to implement:

master: --squash --ff-only

feature/bugfix->develop: --squash --ff-only

release->develop: --no-ff


Unfortunately, I have no way of managing this using BitBucket. I realize that the newest version allows the merge strategy to be directed by the integration manager. Unfortunately, in an organization with over 200 developers, and 20 integration managers, this becomes too chaotic, as incorrect merge strategies will be chosen causing major issues to our repository management.

Is there any consideration for addressing this?







Log in or Sign up to comment
Community showcase
Published in Bitbucket

New improvements to user management in Bitbucket Cloud 👥

Hey Community! We’re willing to wager that quite a few of you not only use Bitbucket, but administer it too. Our team is excited to share that we’ll be releasing improvements throughout this month of...

3,726 views 10 16
Read article

Community Events

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Find an event

Connect with like-minded Atlassian users at free events near you!

Unfortunately there are no Community Events near you at the moment.

Host an event

You're one step closer to meeting fellow Atlassian users at your local event. Learn more about Community Events

Events near you