I have read the answers to a bunch of related questions, and it looks like the answer is to just not use sub-tasks if you want to use boards. I would understand if none of the sub-tasks we have defined appeared in the backlog, but some appear and some do not. I can find no rhyme or reason to why some do and some do not. I have removed the sub-filter from my board's settings, so that shouldn't be related.
Dear @Susan Williams,
I can imagine that all the questions are confusing. We should wipe there a little bit ;)
For Scrum Boards: In the backlog you will see only stories. And epics on the left side. Sub-tasks if stories are only shown as soon as a story is on the agile board (current sprint), by default.
In Kanban mode, where you do not have a backlog (planning is a ongoing permanently), the sub-tasks are visible from the beginning.
So long
Thomas
I should add that we have some stories, as far as I can tell their sub-tasks never appear in the backlog. But we also have tasks, which have sub-tasks that are "technical tasks", and sometimes those appear in the backlog along with their parents, but sometimes they do not. I can't see any obvious difference like they're in different states or anything. This is only on a kanban board, that's all I'm looking at.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Dear @Susan Williams,
so you only use Kanban and nothing else? No second Agile Board on the same project? No modifications to the workflow schemes and issue type schemes?
So long
Thomas
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
We've been using Jira with just filters for quite awhile to track our development, but we have a larger number of products now sharing one project. I started using a kanban board so the swimlanes could help me track activity against each product.
I should say we have different groups of developers who have defined their own boards, I happen to only be using a kanban board. We haven't modified our issue types or workflow, and different tech leads are using whatever method works for them to try and keep track of their issues.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
I see. This multiple boards on one project is often a source of troubles.
It's for me hard to get a clear picture of your current configuration. So any advice will just be a try.
I recommend to separate these multiple products within one project as good as possible, means an issue should not appear on two boards the same time.
So long
Thomas
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Recommended Learning For You
Level up your skills with Atlassian learning
Jira Align Program Essentials
Learn how to use Jira Align at the program level and how to plan for and manage your Program Increment (PI).
Managing Agile Boards and Reports
Learn how to pick the right board type for your team and customize it to fit your specific requirements.
Atlassian Certified Associate
Jira Software Board Configuration
Earn an associate-level credential from Atlassian that shows you can effectively configure Jira Software boards.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.