We've recently made the switch to Advanced Roadmaps. We were using custom issue types and custom link types to represent an issue hierarchy. We have switched to using the Parent Link custom field in Advanced Roadmaps.
I have found a number of non-obvious constraints which I'll publish as a discussion. Firstly, I want to raise awareness of these issues for people transitioning to AR so they can set their user's expectations and, second, I'd like to hear from the community and collect more that I haven't hit yet. I have linked to the Atlassian feature request/bug (where available) to track them.
Note: This is for Cloud version of Jira Premium.
As a side note, if anyone else is moving from custom link types for hierarchy to using Parent Link, I have written up a procedure to do this programmatically. Let me know if there is interest and I'll publish it.
Before I list the constraints I just wanted to say that I'm loving Advanced Roadmaps. It's a great tool. The constraints below are intended to increase awareness and assist the community, they aren't intended to be a critique of the tool.
Here are the constraints I've found so far:
{
"fields": {
"Parent Link":"ABC-123"
}
}
I will try to keep this up to date with further issues I find and with feedback from the community.
When will sorting and using this field on dashboards be avail?
I can see you probably found a few workarounds already but if you're looking for solutions to improve your Advanced Roadmaps reporting you can consider using our indexing service
The app makes it possible to list issues that belong to a certain hierarchy, even recursively. These are the new JQL functions:
You can read more about it in the documentation.
Thanks!