We use git flow, so we do work in feature branches, and we maintain release branches too. When they're finished, they get merged back into `develop`.
Over the past 12 months, about 20 branches have been merged into `develop`, so the graph is getting pretty hard to read - basically useless. See the attached screenshot.
Is there any way to hide the merged branches, but still see unmerged branches?
There is an option to select the current branch or any individual branch if you want a filtered graph and history. Does that help?
I know this is old, but that doesn't help at all. The reason being is that hides all branches. If I understand the parent correctly (and my needs), we want to hide only merged branches but still show all unmerged branches in the graph.
It's really frustrating because I love source tree (especially because of this beautiful graph feature). But when you have a bunch of merged in feature branches that are no longer relevant it becomes useless.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.