Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Comala workflow multiple reviewer types for one approval

Marya Belanger
Contributor
August 24, 2021

I want to distinguish between two different reviewer types (defined as workflow parameters) but involve both types in a single approval.

Requirements:

  • I need users in a group to be listed in a drop down in the Change State dialog the same way "list | options" would be presented.
  • I need to require at least 1 user from that list be chosen as a reviewer for the Technical Review approval.
  • I need to also optionally allow that any other user (not from the group mentioned above) can also be added as a reviewer to the Technical Review approval
  • Only the reviewer selected from the group's review is necessary to move the workflow forward.

 

What I'm trying is: 

{workflowparameter:Required Reviewers|description=At least 1 Team reviewer must be assigned to review the page|type=list|options=GROUP_NAME|edit=true}

{workflowparameter}
{workflowparameter:Optional Reviewers|description=Other reviewers can optionally be assigned to review the page|type=user|edit=true}

{workflowparameter}

 And the review/approval:

{state:Draft|submit=Review|taskable=true|colour=#4A6785|requiredparams=Author}
{state}

{state:Review|approved=Approved|rejected=Draft|taskable=true|requiredparams=Author,Required Reviewers}
{approval:Technical Review|group=&@Required Reviewers@|user=@Optional Reviewers@}

 

There are a couple problems:

  • [type=list|options=GROUP_NAME] just gives a dropdown list where the only item to choose is GROUP_NAME. 
    • Selecting that option makes everyone in the group a required reviewer
    • We only want to require at least one person from the group
    • We want users to be able to scroll through a list of everyone in the group to choose
  • Clicking "Submit" to move from "Draft" to "Review" pulls up the "Change state" prompt asking for the [requiredparams=Author,Required Reviewers]
    • The user isn't aware they can also choose to add optional reviewers unless they change state, click on the elipses, click on parameters, and then see the Optional Reviewers is a field.
    • We need to let them know at the same time they are choosing their one required reviewer from GROUP_NAME that they can also add reviewers from outside that group if they want.

 

1 answer

1 accepted

1 vote
Answer accepted
Matteo Gubellini [SoftComply]
Rising Star
Rising Star
Rising Stars are recognized for providing high-quality answers to other users. Rising Stars receive a certificate of achievement and are on the path to becoming Community Leaders.
August 26, 2021

Hi Marya,

Regarding the requirement to get at least one approver from the group yous should use selectedapprovers rather than "group". Without the "&". This is enough to require the user to select at least one approver from the group.

For the optional approvers, I would create a parallel approval, still using selectedapprovers=@Optional Reviewers@ and a trigger that will move the document to the next state if the required approvers approval is complete and there is nobody assigned to the optional approval.

Something like this:

{state:Review|approved=Approved|rejected=Draft|taskable=true}
{approval:Approval|selectedapprovers=@Required Reviewers@}
{approval:Approval OPTIONAL|selectedapprovers=@Optional Reviewers@}
{state}
{state:Approved|final=true|updated=Review|hideselection=true}
{state}
{trigger:pageapproved|approval=Approval|@Approval OPTIONAL>approvalassignees@=@Empty@}
{set-state:Approved}
{trigger}

I haven't tested it with parameters but it should work.

Matteo

Suggest an answer

Log in or Sign up to answer
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events