Anyone creating advanced rules for quality checks in CC with K15t Scroll Quality?

[John Baker]

I am working to define a more robust set of rules for our implementation of Confluence Cloud with K15t's Scroll Quality app.

The YAML seems simple enough, but I am wondering if anyone has found a way to do... maybe a little more?

[Matthias Gaiser _K15t_ · Accepted solution]

Hey @John Baker

great that you like our app. 😏
Are there concrete topics in mind you'd like to do more?

In case you didn't know, here in our docs you can find all available rule types.

Cheers,
Matthias.

[Matthias Gaiser _K15t_]

@John Baker, on another note. We're planning some updates to the role configuration experience. Would you be willing to jump on a call with us to share your thoughts and we can possibly share some of our plans?

If so, please schedule a call here.

[John Baker]

Did you mean "rule" configuration, or are you updating something to do with "roles," as in security and access?

WRT to the previous post, I did find and use the SQ docs to build my config rules. We moved to Confluence + K15t from Markdown, where we had access to a linting tool. Given that Linter is a parser, it's quite a bit more robust, and we knew that going in to the SQ rules definition.

We are finding some interesting cases, however. We have a need to identify a keyword, such as "air-gapped," that is not immediately followed by the word "environment." When the correct whole phrase appears, I don't want the "air-gapped" term flagged. No way to do that currently that I can see from the docs.

I'll schedule a call with you. Ok to bring some colleagues in on the call when we get it scheduled?

[Matthias Gaiser _K15t_]

Yes, you're right, @John Baker. I meant rule configuration 🙃.

Thank you also for sharing your use case. I'll make sure to share that with our Scroll Content Quality team.

And of course, you're welcome to bring colleagues along.