Looks like I can now link Jira and Confluence to Claude, but what about BItbucket?
Come on Atlassian guys, it's March 30, 2026 and still no news of a native Bitbucket integration with Claude... this is way too frustrating. I get that they want to prioritize their Rovo product, but they can't just sideline Anthropic and all its useful developer features.
Same boat here. Rovo product is not good at all so we want to use claude code and integrate with bitbucket like github has. Will be leaving bitbucket soon because of this.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
This is such a drawback with Bitbucket. Seems Atlassian is trying to make their own AI coding tools, but there's no way they will be able to make it this good (and people already have subscriptions on copilot, claude and chatgpt that could have been used). So moving to github seems to be the best way these days.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
@pokono I feel exactly the same - we’re using Bitbucket mainly because we also use Jira, but it really feels like most of the tooling and integrations are built around GitHub now.
Yeah @Syahrul, great suggestion - thanks. Responses like yours are exactly why the conversation around moving to Linear + GitHub is already happening within our company.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Same boat here. Rovo product is not good at all so we want to use claude code and integrate with bitbucket like github has. Will be leaving bitbucket soon because of this.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hey everyone,
Thanks again for all the thoughtful feedback in this thread.
Current state: no native “Claude ↔ Bitbucket” integration
To directly answer the original question:
There is still no native, out‑of‑the‑box integration that lets you plug your own Anthropic Claude subscription directly into Bitbucket (e.g. “connect Claude to Bitbucket the same way you can connect Jira/Confluence to Claude”).
You can absolutely build on top of Bitbucket’s APIs and webhooks, and there are third‑party options like Composio that some folks have mentioned in this thread, but these aren’t Atlassian-built or supported integrations.
What has changed since this question was first asked?
When this thread started, Bitbucket was running Rovo dev beta. Since then, we’ve officially launched Rovo Dev, Atlassian’s AI assistant for software development, which is integrated with Bitbucket.
Rovo Dev is our current, supported path for “AI + Bitbucket” workflows.
What is Rovo Dev, and how does it relate to Bitbucket?
Rovo Dev is an AI-powered development assistant you can use from:
It’s designed to help with tasks like:
Because Rovo Dev is wired into Atlassian tools, it can work with your Bitbucket repositories and pull requests using your existing permissions. The CLI is built as an extension to the Atlassian Command Line Interface (ACLI), and when you configure it you grant it Bitbucket scopes such as:
read:repository:bitbucketread:pullrequest:bitbucketwrite:pullrequest:bitbucketThis allows Rovo Dev to operate on your Bitbucket data on your behalf (e.g. analyze a repo, draft a PR review, suggest code changes).
For more details:
Which LLMs does Rovo Dev use?
Rovo (and Rovo Dev) use a multi-model approach rather than a single provider. Today, that includes models from providers such as:
So while you can’t:
you can:
Rovo Dev is the path right now for “Bitbucket + Claude-powered development assistance”.
What about “bring your own AI” or direct Claude integration?
We’ve heard the feedback that many teams:
To reflect that, I’ve raised a feature request for a dedicated, opt‑in integration path for 3rd‑party AI tools with Bitbucket:
If this is important to you or your team, I strongly recommend:
I hope this clarifies.
Regards,
Syahrul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
That's a very respectful and pleasant response. But while you're waiting for the ticket to be prioritized, people will simply head to GitHub.
Nobody cares what's under the hood of RovoDev, just add the ability to use either RovoDev or any other solution.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Come on Atlassian guys, it's March 30, 2026 and still no news of a native Bitbucket integration with Claude... this is way too frustrating. I get that they want to prioritize their Rovo product, but they can't just sideline Anthropic and all its useful developer features.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Upvoted. If not implemented in short time - looks like Rovo does not help to develop much for Atlassian it self.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Claude Code is to Rovo as a 747 is to Cessna. If Atlassian doesn't add/improve support for Bitbucket, clients like ourselves are simply going to switch to Github soon. Thanks to git, the switching costs are near zero.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
We are leaving Atlassian because of that. They are living in a bubble and don't care what customers want. We began the process of migration from all three pieces of work: Jira, Confluence, and Bitbucket. The market share is dwindling, milord!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
There are a few workflows that Atlassian is missing with Rovo that are becoming critical in the dev world. We are beyond the days where a dev is only sitting in front of an IDE writing code helped by AI -- maybe only vibe coders do this. We are now in the days where every dev can have multiple agents carrying out small tasks for them. Here are a few we use frequently that don't work with Rovo, and don't work with BitBucket because of BS MCP limitations.
1. Write code from Jira comments: with a comment in a Jira ticket "@Cody, look at the description on this ticket and issue the fix.", a webhook can fire off AI that then has access to the branch in bitbucket to write the code and issue the PR. We are doing this through multiple connectors now, but not Claude, which would be optimal. Right now, if you tag Rovo in a Jira comment, it says: "Sorry, I cannot currently write code in your repository."
2. Write code from Slack: This lets your dev team work as puppeteers, giving them multiple "employees" to handle the small tasks in Jira. "Hey @cody, take a look at jira ticket BS-156 and make the changes outlined in the description. Post a PR in the #devprs channel when you are done." Again, we are doing this through multiple, expensive hoops, which are worthwhile, because they amplify our most expensive team (dev), but every link in the chain just exemplifies Atlassian's lack of foresight.
3. Triage Code issues from Slack/Teams: "Hey @BugSwatter, take a look at the thread above, and see if there is a condition in app/Services/PrimerService.php that could cause the above issue. If so, create a Jira ticket with the exact changes that need to be made."
Rovo Dev is a pair coder, extremely late to the AI pair-coding game. It's attractive, because it's built into Jira and BitBucket, but by blocking outside AI integrations, it's cutting off entire modern methods of work in fast-moving dev companies that are embracing the edge of the curve.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Hey, you can use Composio Bitbucket MCP integration with Claude code https://composio.dev/toolkits/bitbucket/framework/claude-code
Disclaimer: I am from Composio. Thanks.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
It's super expensive and detached from reality. This thing is supposed to be free and provided by Atlassian, otherwise there is no point at all. You don't need to continue to chew this cactus and pay for painkillers, when you can just switch to Azure DevOps, Github and many other providers.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
G'day, @Rick Theder
Welcome to the community!
We don't have native integration with Claude at this moment. You may check with Claude to see if it's something that can be integrated with our existing API or webhook.
Regards,
Syahrul
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You guys are not worried that in this world of AI, we're all going to be forced to move on to GitHub?
Right now we feel the technical debt of having chosen Bitbucket instead of GitHub. All new projects are in GitHub because integration with AI is powerful.
I don't understand the brush-off attitude here.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
Their head of product needs to be fired. I've used Bitbucket for 10+ years (they offered free private repos when GitHub didn't!) and Atlassian has completely missed the boat when it comes to AI tooling i.e., the next wave in software development for Bitbucket. Already moved a few private repos to GitHub.
Get with it before it's too late!
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.
You must be a registered user to add a comment. If you've already registered, sign in. Otherwise, register and sign in.