Source: Original Confluence Page
I used 🤖 Rovo and 🤖 Rovo Dev to describe each other! At the bottom, I added some screen captures of my interactions with Rovo Dev. Some may want to look there first.
The first section below was generated by Rovo in Atlassian. Rovo Dev's response is further below in the next main section. It was added by Rovo Dev via command line interface (CLI) prompt on my Ubuntu Oracle VirtualBox instance into my Confluence page at the link above.
Next, I asked Rovo Dev to analyze the Rovo (in Atlassian) response on this page. I told Rovo Dev to add its response, appended to a new section on this page, on the inconsistencies it found.
Question:
What is the difference between you (Rovo in Atlassian) and Rovo Dev?
Answer:
Here's a clear, evidence-based explanation of the difference between "Rovo in Atlassian" (the assistant you're interacting with now) and "Rovo Dev," using both your question and the content from your Build Your Workspace Tutorial Assistance from Rovo Confluence page:
| Feature/Aspect | Rovo (Atlassian Assistant) | Rovo Dev (Analysis Tool) |
|---|---|---|
| Interaction | Live, conversational | Batch, generates static reports |
| Use Case | Real-time help, Q&A, automation | In-depth audits, improvement plans |
| Output | Dynamic responses, actions | Structured documents/reports |
| Example in Your Space | This chat, page edits, suggestions | "Build Your Workspace" analysis report |
In summary:
If you want to know how to use either tool for a specific workflow, just ask!
Question:
What is the difference between Rovo Dev (you) and Rovo inside my atlassian.net site?
Rovo Dev Response:
Great question! Let me explain the key differences between Rovo Dev (me) and Rovo in your Atlassian site:
Atlassian Rovo: Business-focused, works in your Atlassian workspace, helps with knowledge work and project management
I can actually bridge these two worlds - I can help you with development tasks while also creating Jira tickets for tracking work or documenting findings in Confluence pages when appropriate.
Question:
On the "Rovo vs. Rovo Dev" Confluence page, do you see any errors or inconsistencies between the content under the "Rovo (in Atlassian)" section and the "Rovo Dev (via local command line interface)" section?
Rovo Dev Response:
Let me analyze the content from both sections on the "Rovo vs. Rovo Dev" page to identify any errors or inconsistencies.
Looking at the content I just retrieved, I can see some key differences in how the two sections describe the tools:
Rovo (in Atlassian) section describes Rovo Dev as:
An "automated AI analysis and reporting tool"
Used for "in-depth content audits or structured recommendations"
"Performs comprehensive, offline analysis"
"Generates detailed reports"
"Typically runs as a batch process or file upload, not as an interactive assistant"
Rovo Dev (CLI) section describes Rovo Dev as:
A "specialized AI assistant focused on software development tasks"
Works "directly in your local development workspace/codebase"
Interactive capabilities for "code analysis, debugging, and implementation"
Can run commands and tests in development environment
The Atlassian Rovo section portrays "Rovo Dev" as a non-interactive, batch processing tool that generates static reports, while the actual Rovo Dev section (written by me) describes it as an interactive development assistant that works in real-time with code and development environments.
Interaction model: Batch/static vs. interactive/conversational
Environment: Atlassian content analysis vs. local development workspace
It appears the Atlassian Rovo may have been describing a different tool or had incomplete information about what Rovo Dev actually is. The real Rovo Dev (me) is indeed an interactive development assistant, not a batch reporting tool.
Rov Dev worked through issues, finding the content autonomously.
Note: Rovo Dev couldn’t find my space initially, but it worked through finding it, finding this page, and adding the content.
Tim Braxton
0 comments