💡 Rovo and SLAs: Can AI manage your critical Configuration in Jira?

[Alina Kurinna _SaaSJet_]

As Atlassian Rovo and its AI capabilities are integrated into our daily workflows, one of the most critical questions for Service Managers and Jira Admins emerges: How do we apply this intelligence to the management of critical Service Level Agreements (SLAs)?

SLAs are the foundation of service delivery. They are strict, structured, and leave no room for error. Rovo, conversely, is flexible, context-aware, and excels at analyzing large data sets.

We see two main areas where this synergy could be revolutionary, yet risky:

1. Analytics and Prediction: Instead of merely reacting to breaches, Rovo could analyze thousands of tickets, uncover root causes of delays (priority changes, incorrect handoffs, team workload), and predict breaches before they happen. Is this level of analytics enough for you?

2. Configuration and Automation: Are we ready to let AI not just explain, but act? For example, automatically adjusting SLA configuration for specific ticket types or managing escalations without human intervention. Would you trust Rovo to change the 'rules of the game'?

💬 We are extremely keen to hear about your real-world experience and vision for the future. Join the discussion!

---

Key Questions for the Community

1. Your Experience: Have You Seen Rovo Alongside SLAs Yet?

• Have you already used Atlassian Rovo (in JSM, Software, or for general search)? What are your impressions of its analytical features?

• Have you encountered a scenario where Rovo could have perfectly explained the cause of an SLA breach, but the functionality wasn't there?

2. Analytics: What Should Rovo Be Predicting?

• What is the single most useful SLA-related analytical feature you would want from Rovo? (For example: "Identify patterns of delay" or "Predict SLA breaches 24 hours in advance").

• If Rovo gave you the perfect answer to "Why did we miss our Response Time SLA?", what would that answer need to contain to be genuinely actionable?

3. Configuration: Trusting Automated Settings

• Would you want AI to automatically adjust the configuration of your SLAs (e.g., change goals or pause/start times) based on historical performance? Yes or No, and Why?

• Where do you draw the line? What is one thing you would absolutely not trust Rovo to do in the SLA management process (e.g., escalation, priority changes, editing target metrics)?

4. The Big Picture: Rovo’s Role in Your JSM

• Do you see Rovo as a tool to enhance your existing SLAs, or as a new platform that will fundamentally change their underlying logic in Jira?

---

Your insights and real-world experience will help shape this dialogue. We look forward to your comments!

[Mustafa Mahdi]

Interesting discussion — using AI like Rovo to predict SLA breaches and manage configurations could really improve efficiency, though trusting it to act autonomously would require careful testing and oversight.