When you're managing IT services across multiple platforms, like Jira Service Management and ServiceNow, you need to integrate them to create a seamless data flow.
But with so many integration approaches and tools available, how do you choose the right ITSM integration for your organization?
Native integrations come built into your ITSM platform. For example, Jira Service Management's native integration with Jira Software. These integrations offer easy setup since they're pre-configured and maintained by the vendor with reliable updates.
However, they're limited to what the vendor provides, with minimal customization options and restricted to specific platforms. Native integrations work best for organizations wanting a quick setup between tools from the same vendor ecosystem.
These are specialized tools explicitly built for connections between ITSM systems and are often more flexible than native options, with maintenance handled by specialized vendors.
The downside is the additional cost and potential need to manage multiple integration apps for different connections.
Template-based integration apps provide you with default, templated connectors for syncing different platforms, while script-based integration apps allow you to write and generate scripts to control the connection.
If you’re looking for plug-and-play solutions, use template integrations. If you want extra flexibility for different use cases, then a script-based integration like Exalate is the way forward.
iPaaS solutions provide cloud-based platforms to connect multiple applications. These platforms come with visual workflow builders and no-code/low-code setup, making them good for simple automations.
However, they can become expensive with high data volumes, have limited depth for complex ITSM scenarios, and may struggle with granular field mapping.
Custom integrations are built in-house using the respective system APIs. Your development team might build custom code to sync data between Jira Service Management and your internal legacy system, for instance.
Custom integrations give you complete control and customization, can handle unique business logic, and avoid vendor lock-in.
However, this comes at a steep technical and financial cost. The tradeoffs include requiring development resources, an ongoing maintenance burden, and having to manage error handling and security yourself.
Understanding how organizations actually use ITSM integrations can help you identify which approach fits your needs best:
Many organizations use a combination of these approaches. You might use native integrations where available and suitable for your use case, third-party integration solutions for intricate ITSM connections, and template-based tools for simpler automations.
The key is understanding your requirements—data volume, complexity of workflows, technical resources, and budget—then selecting the integration type that best matches those needs.
If you’re trying to get a reliable ITSM integration tool, book a free call with me to learn more.