Forums

Articles
Create
cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 

Your Confluence Has a Visibility Problem, Not a Content Problem

Most teams assume their internal knowledge problems come from not having enough documentation. In reality, the opposite is often true. Teams create plenty of pages in Confluence (especially now with AI) - sometimes too many. The real challenge is that the right people rarely see the right content at the right time.

In other words: your organisation doesn’t have a content problem. It has a visibility problem.

The Content Explosion Nobody Talks About

As companies grow, so does the volume of pages they produce. Every project update, every retro, every design decision, every onboarding checklist, every leadership message ends up in Confluence. It’s all well-intentioned - teams want to keep information centralised and documented.

But Confluence’s strength as a wiki and documentation tool also becomes its weakness.

It stores everything, but it doesn’t naturally surface anything.

At Amoeboids, we’ve created our fair share of pages. Onboarding guides, weekly notes, technical write-ups, internal initiatives - everything landed in Confluence. The problem wasn’t the writing. The problem was helping people find what mattered after the day it was published.

Most pages enjoyed just a brief moment of visibility- shared once in Slack, maybe commented on by a handful of people - and then they sank quietly into the hierarchy. They were still there. Still useful. Still accurate. But effectively invisible.

Content explosion.png

Why Structure Alone Isn’t Enough

Confluence is organised by spaces, folders, and pages. It makes perfect sense to admins and the people who maintain documentation. But for everyday users, the structure often feels too deep, too rigid, and too disconnected from their daily workflow.

  • People don’t casually browse Confluence
  • They don’t explore nested folder/page structures
  • They don’t remember which space something belonged to

Even when we created curated spaces like our internal Team Portal, the same pattern reappeared. People checked the space when they remembered to, not because anything inside Confluence naturally drew their attention to updates.

The assumption behind structured documentation is flawed: If we publish it, the team will see it. But most of the time, they don’t.

Search Isn’t Discovery

Search technically works - but only if you already know that something exists. Most people don’t. They can’t search for pages they’ve never heard of. A new onboarding resource, an updated strategy note, a critical decision log - none of this surfaces unless someone explicitly goes looking for it.

And even then, search is a solitary activity. It doesn’t create shared awareness. It doesn’t generate team-wide alignment. It doesn’t spark engagement or conversation.

Discovery is different. Discovery is when information finds you, not the other way around.

Confluence today is excellent at storage and retrieval. But it struggles with discovery.

Discovery.png

The Short Life of a Confluence Page

Most pages follow a predictable lifecycle. Someone writes it thoughtfully. It gets shared once - usually in Slack. A few people read it immediately. And within 24 hours, it becomes just another document in the structure.

It’s not that the content lacks importance. It simply lacks circulation.

During the pandemic, we wrote leadership updates that we hoped everyone would read. The only reliable way to draw attention to them was to repost them in Slack - a workaround that felt disconnected from the place where the content actually lived. And by the next day, those Slack messages were gone too.

We were documenting well. We just weren’t communicating effectively. 

What’s Missing: A Discovery Layer

Teams don’t need more pages. They need a better way to surface the pages they already have.

A discovery layer inside Confluence changes the equation. It creates a dynamic flow of updates, highlights, recaps, and resurfaced pages. It brings important content into view - not just at the moment it’s published, but again and again as context demands.

This isn’t about replacing documentation. It’s about adding a circulation system to documentation. When information moves, people notice it. When information sits still, they don’t.

Chirp’s Role in Fixing the Visibility Gap

This is exactly the problem we built Chirp to solve. While it started as a place for micro-posts, what really makes Chirp valuable is how it pulls Confluence content into motion. Pages that would normally disappear into the hierarchy become visible through posts, category highlights, surface-level updates, and conversations around them.

Anyone can resurface an important page in seconds. Leaders can make quick announcements without creating full pages. Teams can create rituals that organically point back to existing documentation. Polls draw attention to decisions and reference pages.

Slowly, visibility becomes a habit instead of a manual effort.

The Real Future of Knowledge Management

Remote and hybrid teams don’t suffer from a lack of documentation- they suffer from a lack of discoverability. Teams need a way to keep knowledge alive, circulating, and continuously visible.

Confluence provides the structure. Chirp adds the visibility.

And in modern organisations, visibility is what makes knowledge truly valuable.

5 comments

Stavros_Rougas_EasyApps
Atlassian Partner
December 11, 2025

@Anand Inamdar_Amoeboids I would add that another key aspect is having spaces that are reasonably up to date. If Confluence is not part of a single source of truth then people will not return to spaces to discover content.

I say this as someone who is often the 'content person' and having built, and keep getting feedback on such problems, a bulk content management app (Space Content Manager).

Like Anand Inamdar_Amoeboids likes this
Anand Inamdar_Amoeboids
Atlassian Partner
December 11, 2025

Thank you for sharing your thoughts @Stavros_Rougas_EasyApps
I think its a given that the content within Confluence needs to be up to date otherwise you risk losing the team's interest in looking at Confluence. I think with Confluence automation offering it is now possible to auto-archive or at least identify stale content & then use apps such as yours to actually act on those.

Megan Osifeso
Contributor
December 11, 2025

Well said. Thank you for this post!

Like Anand Inamdar_Amoeboids likes this
Elena_Communardo Products
Atlassian Partner
December 11, 2025

@Anand Inamdar_Amoeboids This really resonates: most teams don’t have a documentation problem, they have a ‘nobody ever sees the good stuff’ problem. We’ve had the same experience: tons of useful pages quietly disappearing into the archive after day one. Adding a discovery layer like Chirp makes a ton of sense, and pairing it with Viewtracker - Analytics for Confluence has helped us see which pages actually get attention and which ones stay invisible. Once you know what’s being read (and what isn’t), it becomes way easier to see where to focus your energy and improve content.

Like Anand Inamdar_Amoeboids likes this
Anand Inamdar_Amoeboids
Atlassian Partner
December 11, 2025

@Elena_Communardo Products add to it the AI slop these days & everybody can create tons of lengthy, important sounding pages with no real value. That's why keeping track of trending pages & the pages where users are actually engaged is really the key.

Comment

Log in or Sign up to comment
TAGS
AUG Leaders

Atlassian Community Events