Why Remote Teams Struggle with Awareness, Not Productivity

[#1]

One of the most common assumptions about remote teams is that productivity is the main challenge. Leaders worry about whether people are working enough, whether things are moving fast enough, or whether accountability is slipping without physical presence. 

But after working with a fully remote and hybrid team for years, I’ve come to a different conclusion. 

Most remote teams aren’t struggling with productivity at all.

They’re struggling with awareness. 

People are busy. Work is getting done. Tickets are being closed. Features are being shipped. And yet, teams often feel oddly disconnected. Surprised by decisions. Unaware of progress. Out of sync with each other’s priorities.

That disconnect rarely shows up in metrics - but it shows up in daily work.

Productivity Is Visible. Awareness Quietly Disappears

Remote work has made productivity easier to measure than ever before. We can see commits, pull requests, Jira tickets, customer responses, and delivery timelines. Output is rarely the problem.

Awareness, on the other hand, is much harder to notice until it’s gone. People don’t always know what others are working on. They don’t know why a decision was made. They don’t know what changed last week unless someone explicitly tells them. 

At Amoeboids, we noticed this pattern early. Work was progressing well, but context often lagged behind. Important updates existed - usually documented in Confluence -but many team members simply didn’t encounter them at the right time. 

How Offices Accidentally Solved This Problem 

Before remote work, offices created awareness almost by accident. You overheard conversations. You saw someone sketch ideas on a whiteboard. You picked up context from hallway chats and casual lunch discussions.

None of this was structured, but it worked.

Remote work removed these ambient signals overnight. And while teams replaced them with tools like Slack and Teams, those tools weren’t designed to recreate awareness - they were designed for speed. 

The result is a lot of communication, but surprisingly little shared understanding.

Why Chat Tools Create Noise, Not Awareness

Chat tools feel active. Messages fly by. Channels stay busy. But activity doesn’t equal awareness.

Important updates get mixed with casual conversations. Threads disappear within hours. Private DMs fragment context. And unless you happen to be online at the right moment, you miss things that might have mattered.

We found ourselves repeatedly posting Confluence links into Slack just to make sure people noticed them. Even then, visibility was temporary. By the next day, the message was gone - buried under newer conversations.

Chat is excellent for immediacy. It’s terrible for sustained awareness.

The Real Cost of Low Awareness 

When awareness drops, teams pay for it unknowingly. Work gets duplicated because someone didn’t know a guide already existed. New hires feel lost because they can’t see what’s important. Leaders assume alignment that isn’t actually there. Meetings increase - not because people want them, but because they’re trying to recreate shared context.

None of this looks like a productivity problem on paper. But it slows teams down in subtle, cumulative ways.

Awareness Comes from Small, Visible Signals

The solution isn’t more meetings or more dashboards. Awareness is built through small, frequent, visible signals.

• A short update about project progress.
• A quick note explaining a decision.
• A learning shared publicly.
• A win acknowledged.

These moments don’t require long-form documentation, but they do need to be visible and persistent. Remote teams don’t need to talk more. They need to see more.

What an Awareness Layer Looks Like in Practice 

In an ideal remote setup, updates don’t rely on perfect timing or manual reminders. They surface naturally.

Someone posts a short reflection. Another links a page worth revisiting. A leader shares a brief thought instead of scheduling a meeting. A poll gathers quick alignment around a decision.

Over time, this creates a shared understanding of what’s happening across the team- even asynchronously.

Chirp as an Awareness Layer for Remote Teams 

This is exactly the gap Chirp was designed to fill. By adding a shared, persistent feed inside Confluence, Chirp makes everyday work visible again. It brings updates, learnings, and decisions into a place teams already trust - without relying on chat tools or forcing heavy documentation.

Chirp doesn’t replace pages. It gives them context, visibility, and life.

Fix Awareness First

Remote teams don’t need to work harder. They don’t need more tools or more processes. 

They need awareness.

Once teams can see what’s happening around them, alignment improves naturally. Collaboration becomes easier. Culture strengthens. And productivity - already present - finally feels connected.

Fix awareness first. Everything else follows.