Every team has seen it: the sprint board looks busy, most tasks are marked “In Progress” and it seems like everything is on track. But when demo day arrives, a lot of work is still unfinished.
How can there be so much activity, but so little actually done?
The problem is that teams often trust the board too much. They look at the current status in Jira and assume it reflects reality, without asking how each task actually moved through the process.
A ticket marked “In Progress” might have been ignored for days. Something marked “Done” could have been blocked for most of the sprint. The status column only shows where things are now not what really happened.
To see that, you need to look at the issue’s history.
Jira is good at showing the current status of a task, but it doesn’t make it easy to see how the task got there. Because of this, teams often miss warning signs that slow down delivery:
These kinds of hidden blockers pile up and make it hard to finish work on time. Without a clear view of issue history, these problems are almost impossible to spot.
Jira keeps a detailed record of status changes, assignee updates, comments, and most field edits for every issue. This means there’s a nearly complete history for each task, as long as you know where to look.
By checking issue history, you can answer questions like:
When teams start looking at how work actually moves through the process not just where it is right now they get a much clearer picture of what’s working and what’s not.
Imagine two teams both working on the same kind of task: connecting their product to an outside API.
🔴 Team A — Working in the Dark
Team A creates a Jira ticket for the job. A developer picks it up halfway through the sprint. The board says “In Progress,” and everyone assumes things are fine.
But the developer gets stuck because the API documentation is confusing. No one else knows. QA isn’t told there’s a problem, so they don’t prepare. The ticket just sits there for days.
When it’s time to show the work, the task isn’t finished. The project manager is annoyed, QA is caught off guard, and nobody can say exactly what went wrong.
The problem? The board only showed the status, not what was really happening.
🟢 Team B — They Keep Track of What’s Happening
Team B works in a similar way, but they pay attention to how long each task spends in different states like “Waiting,” “In Progress,” or “Blocked.”
When their API ticket sits idle for two days, the Scrum Master notices and checks in with the developer.
They talk, figure out the problem, and get things moving again.
QA sees the ticket move out of “Blocked” and starts getting ready.
By the end of the sprint, the work is done. The team didn’t work faster, but everyone knew what was happening, so nothing got stuck.
Making issue history visible shouldn’t be a separate ceremony. The best teams bake it into daily workflows:
When teams pay attention to what’s actually happening with their work, they can spot problems early and make better decisions, instead of just reacting when things go wrong.
Issue history isn’t just a list of transitions. It’s a goldmine of delivery insight.
Here’s what experienced teams extract from it:
Once you see work through this perspective, there’s no unseeing it.
You can track all this by hand, but it takes a lot of effort. If you want a simpler way, there’s a tool that can help.
Issue Delivery Report is a smart Forge app for Jira Cloud that:
If you want better planning, smoother delivery, and fewer surprises start with the story that’s already being written in Jira. Just look a little deeper.
Maksym Babenko_TypeSwitch_
Online forums and learning are now in one easy-to-use experience.
By continuing, you accept the updated Community Terms of Use and acknowledge the Privacy Policy. Your public name, photo, and achievements may be publicly visible and available in search engines.
0 comments