Hello there!
I'm Elena from Elevatic.
Working with enterprise Atlassian environments, I've noticed a recurring pattern: organizations don't struggle because they have too many Marketplace apps, they struggle because they lack a strategy for managing them.
That's why I wanted to share some thoughts on app governance, adoption, and how enterprises can get more value from every app they install.
The problem: Most enterprises have dozens, sometimes hundreds, of Atlassian Marketplace apps installed with no central ownership, no evaluation process, and no adoption strategy. The result isn't too many apps — it's the wrong apps, poorly deployed, with nobody accountable for their success.
What this article covers:
You open your Atlassian admin console and see 140 apps installed across your instance. A significant number haven't been actively promoted to users. Several were installed without a rollout plan. And a handful were set up by team leads who lacked the IT support needed to drive real adoption.
Sound familiar?
This is the reality for most large organizations running Atlassian tools. The Marketplace is one of the most powerful ecosystems in enterprise software — home to over 8,000 apps extending Jira, Confluence, Jira Service Management, and Bitbucket in almost every conceivable direction. But that power goes unrealized when organizations install apps without a strategy for evaluating, deploying, and getting value from them.
The issue isn't that enterprises have too many apps. It's that they have apps without ownership, adoption plans, or a clear picture of the business value each one delivers. That's a governance problem and it's costing organizations not in license fees, but in missed potential.
This article walks through what a healthy marketplace app strategy looks like and how building one helps enterprises get dramatically more from the tools they invest in.
A project manager flags a recurring problem: tickets keep getting assigned to team members who are out of office, causing delays and dropped handovers. Someone installs Out of Office Sync for Jira to automatically surface absence information from Outlook directly in Jira. It goes live with no rollout communication, no automation rules configured, and no designated owner. Six months later, half the team doesn't know it exists, assignees are still going dark on tickets, and the app gets blamed — when the real problem was never the app itself.
The average mid-to-large enterprise running Atlassian Cloud or Data Center has between 50 and 300 Marketplace apps installed. Many have never been formally onboarded with users. Fewer still have been evaluated against defined business outcomes. Almost none have formal ownership assigned to champion their adoption.
The patterns are consistent across organizations:
The result: an app portfolio that nobody fully trusts, where value is left on the table across the board.
1. Security Blind Spots from Unreviewed Apps
Every Marketplace app you install represents a trust decision. Connect apps — the majority of older Marketplace apps so far — operate with OAuth scopes and communicate with your Atlassian instance's data. When you install a Connect app without a security review, you are implicitly trusting a third-party vendor's infrastructure, data handling practices, and ongoing security posture.
Most enterprises don't have a process for that review. They also rarely revisit it over time — even as vendor ownership changes or new compliance requirements emerge.
A strong governance strategy doesn't mean avoiding third-party apps. It means knowing exactly which vendors you trust, why, and under what conditions. That's a competitive advantage in regulated industries and a procurement accelerator in enterprise sales cycles. As an example of vendor transparency in practice, you can explore Elevatic's Trust Center, which covers security, compliance, and resources in one place.
2. Adoption Gaps from Overlapping Tools
Walk through a typical enterprise Confluence environment, and you'll often find multiple apps serving similar purposes, different teams using different tools for the same job, with no shared standard and no cross-team visibility.
This isn't an argument for fewer tools. It's an argument for intentional standardization. When an organization decides deliberately that one app is the standard for a given use case — and backs that decision with rollout support, training, and executive visibility — adoption rates climb dramatically, and the app delivers its full value.
Governance creates the conditions for apps to succeed, not just exist.
3. Invisible Value from Poor Adoption Tracking
Atlassian Cloud app pricing scales with the number of users. An app that represents a meaningful investment at enterprise scale should be delivering meaningful, measurable value. But most organizations have no framework for tracking it, no usage benchmarks, no business outcome metrics and no feedback loops between IT and end users.
The result is that even high-quality apps get questioned at renewal time, because nobody documented the value they delivered. A governance framework solves this by building value tracking into the lifecycle from day one.
4. Procurement Friction from No Evaluation Process
Enterprise app procurement is often slower than it needs to be, not because of the apps themselves, but because there's no agreed-upon process for evaluating and approving them. Security reviews get invented from scratch each time. Stakeholder sign-off loops run long. Vendors can't predict timelines.
A defined app evaluation framework dramatically accelerates this. When procurement knows exactly which questions to ask and which boxes to check, good apps get approved faster and deployed sooner.
5. Compliance Exposure from Unaudited Data Flows
For enterprises operating under GDPR, HIPAA, SOC 2, or other frameworks, every app that processes or stores data is a potential compliance touchpoint. Without an audit trail of what data each app accesses and where it flows, demonstrating compliance becomes difficult and the audit conversation becomes reactive rather than confident.
Organizations with strong app governance answer compliance questions from a position of documented clarity. Those without it scramble.
A mature 3rd-party app governance strategy has four components: inventory, evaluation, selection, and lifecycle management. Here's how to approach each.
Start with what you have. In Atlassian Cloud, navigate to Settings > Apps > Manage apps to see a full list of installed apps. For Data Center, this lives in Administration > Manage apps.
For each app, document:
This inventory is the foundation of everything that follows. It will reveal which apps are working, which never got a fair launch, and which need a fresh adoption push rather than a replacement conversation.
The right question when assessing an app isn't "is it being used?". It's "is it solving the problem it was installed to solve?" Low usage often reflects a deployment gap, not a product gap.
A structured app evaluation framework should assess:
Going forward, no app should be installed without a defined approval workflow. The process doesn't need to be bureaucratic, but it does need to be consistent.
A strong enterprise app approval checklist covers:
This process protects the organization and it also protects good apps from being unfairly evaluated. An app that goes through a rigorous process and is approved arrives with organizational confidence. That's the foundation of successful adoption.
Approving an app is not the end of governance; it's the beginning. Enterprise app portfolios need ongoing lifecycle management to deliver sustained value.
Not all Marketplace apps are built the same way, and the architectural difference between Connect and Forge apps has real implications for enterprise procurement and security reviews.
Connect apps run on the vendor's external infrastructure and communicate with your Atlassian instance via REST APIs using OAuth. They have a mature vendor ecosystem.
Key enterprise procurement questions for Connect apps:
Connect apps from certified vendors suit enterprises; governance just documents trust.
Forge apps run inside Atlassian's infrastructure in sandboxed cloud functions, not on vendor servers.
Forge offers enterprise benefits:
As Forge grows, apps built on it often pass enterprise security reviews faster. Knowing the app framework helps procurement.
The organizations that extract the most value from Atlassian Marketplace apps share a few consistent traits. They treat app selection as a strategic decision. They invest in rollout and adoption as seriously as they invest in evaluation. They build relationships with their vendors and treat the Marketplace as a curated ecosystem rather than a free-for-all.
They also recognize something important: the Atlassian platform's native capabilities and the Marketplace ecosystem are not in competition. Native features provide the foundation; Marketplace apps provide the specialized depth that enterprise workflows actually require. The best enterprise app strategies use both deliberate native and specialized apps where the use case demands more.
The right app, properly evaluated, properly deployed, and properly supported, doesn't add cost to an Atlassian environment. It multiplies the value of everything around it.
Ready to build an 3rd-party app governance framework that drives adoption and ROI?
Elena_Elevatic
0 comments